Personalized Incentive Routing for Traffic Delay Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current navigation systems fail to effectively utilize real-time traffic incidents to offer users productive alternatives during travel delays, often resulting in inefficient use of time for both users and retail/service establishments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that leverage real-time traffic data to provide personalized incentives to users, encouraging them to re-route to retail or service facilities by calculating the minimal incentive needed to make completing tasks on their list more attractive than enduring travel delays, using a computing device that integrates navigation, incentive generation, and task management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If navigation systems provide alternate routes to avoid traffic incidents, then travel time is reduced, but the alternate route may be longer or involve additional aggravation such as stop signs, traffic lights, deteriorating roadways

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidroute quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of traffic incidents (delays) into a beneficial opportunity by suggesting detours to retail facilities. Instead of merely avoiding traffic, the system transforms wait time into productive shopping or service time, making the detour attractive through personalized incentives like coupons and discounts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces retail facilities as intermediary destinations between the user's origin and final destination. These facilities serve as mediators that break up the journey, providing both alternative routing to avoid traffic and opportunities for user engagement through shopping or services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If navigation systems suggest alternate routes, then users can avoid traffic incidents, but the alternate route may simply become flooded with other drivers attempting to also take the alternate route

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidroute reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing personalized, location-specific incentives tailored to each user's preferences and the specific retail facilities along their route. Rather than a generic route suggestion, the system customizes the detour experience with relevant coupons and discounts for stores the user is likely to visit, making the alternate route uniquely attractive to each individual.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-calculating personalized incentives and preparing the detour route before the user actually takes it. The system proactively identifies suitable retail facilities, generates relevant coupons, and presents the complete personalized detour package in advance, allowing users to make informed decisions before encountering traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If retail facilities offer incentives to attract users during traffic delays, then user visits increase, but the incentive cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser visit rateVSAvoidincentive cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting incentive parameters (coupon value, discount percentage, cashback amount) based on multiple factors including traffic delay duration, user preferences, retail facility type, and probability of user acceptance. This allows facilities to optimize incentive costs by offering higher values when users are more likely to accept and when delays are longer, while reducing costs when delays are brief or user interest is low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by offering incentives selectively rather than universally. The system calculates the probability of user acceptance for each potential incentive and only presents those with sufficient probability thresholds. Additionally, incentives are tailored to match user preferences and task lists, ensuring partial but targeted engagement rather than broad, costly outreach to all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10584973B2Personalized incentives leveraging incident-aware routing
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10584973B2 patent drawing
  • US10584973B2 patent drawing
  • US10584973B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems, methods, and computer program products that provide a user with alternative options to incident induced traffic by presenting the user with an alternate route to perform other tasks on a task list when travel is delayed by the incident. The method includes receiving a current location, a navigation route, an expected delay due to an incident, and a list of tasks from the user. Each task in the list may include a value and expected duration. The method further includes computing an incentive for each task in the list based on the received information and a probability that the user will re-route to stop at a facility for fulfilling the task, comparing the incentive and probability to determine which task has a minimal incentive and a greater probability that the user will re-route than not re-route to the facility, and presenting the minimal incentive to the user.