Personalized Task Proposal Generation via Real-Time Resource Queries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to efficiently identify and recommend tasks and proposals tailored to individual member preferences, leading to increased cognitive load and inefficiencies in task delegation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that queries a resource library in real-time to identify proposal templates and recommendations based on member profiles and historical data, generating proposals that can be customized and updated based on member interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing systems are used to identify and recommend tasks, then task identification can be performed, but the system fails to efficiently tailor recommendations to individual member preferences, leading to increased cognitive load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecognitive loadVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting member preferences, historical data, and interaction patterns in advance. Member profiles are pre-populated with preference information, and the system pre-processes this data to enable rapid generation of personalized task recommendations without increasing cognitive load during actual task identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring member interactions with proposed tasks and recommendations. This feedback is used to update and refine member profiles, improving the accuracy of personalized recommendations over time while reducing the cognitive effort required to evaluate task options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If manual task delegation processes are used, then tasks can be assigned, but inefficiencies arise due to lack of automated coordination and personalized recommendations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask delegation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by creating a multi-functional platform that handles task identification, proposal generation, member profiling, preference tracking, and automated coordination through a single integrated system. This eliminates the need for multiple separate manual processes while managing complexity through unified architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating personalized task proposals and recommendations based on member profiles and historical data. The automated coordination system independently manages task delegation workflows without requiring manual intervention, thereby improving productivity while containing system complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If generic proposal templates are used, then proposals can be generated quickly, but they fail to provide personalized recommendations tailored to member preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization levelVSAvoidproposal generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing member preference data and historical information into structured member profiles. This pre-processing enables the system to quickly retrieve and apply relevant personalization parameters when generating proposals, achieving both personalization and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting proposal content based on member-specific parameters stored in profiles. These parameters include preferred task types, communication styles, and historical preferences, allowing the system to generate personalized proposals efficiently by modifying template parameters rather than creating content from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12367435B2Systems and methods for proposal generation in a task determination system
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 PANASONIC WELL LLC
  • US12367435B2 patent drawing
  • US12367435B2 patent drawing
  • US12367435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for proposal generation in a task recommendation system are provided. A task recommendation system may receive a completed task template corresponding to a task associated with a member. The task recommendation system may automatically query a resource library in real-time to identify a proposal template corresponding to the task type. The task recommendation system may then identify a proposal recommendation for a proposal option associated with a set of proposal options included in the proposal template. The task recommendation system may generate and present a proposal that includes the proposal recommendation. Based on member interaction with the proposal, the task recommendation system may update the member profile and the resource library.