Personalized Tax Interview System Using Prototype Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of preparing a tax return is laborious and burdensome, often resulting in irrelevant questions being omitted, which can lead to errors such as overpayment or underpayment, due to the comprehensive nature of traditional tax interviews that fail to personalize the questioning process for individual taxpayers.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes past tax returns and imported tax form data to determine relevant prototypes, which are used to personalize and shorten the tax interview by presenting only the necessary questions to the taxpayer, utilizing a typecasting engine, data import engine, and user interface engine to identify and present relevant portions of the full tax interview.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a comprehensive tax interview is used to address all possible tax categories, then all potential tax issues are covered, but the interview becomes burdensome and time-consuming for taxpayers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of tax returnVSAvoidtime for tax preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive tax interview is segmented into multiple modules or sections based on taxpayer characteristics. The system divides the full interview into relevant subsets by analyzing taxpayer profiles, income sources, and tax situations, presenting only the applicable segments to each taxpayer rather than the complete interview sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of taxpayer data before conducting the interview. By pre-processing taxpayer information, financial data, and tax history, the system determines which interview sections are relevant beforehand, allowing it to skip unnecessary questions and proceed directly to applicable tax categories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the tax interview is abbreviated to reduce burden, then taxpayer time is reduced, but relevant questions may be omitted leading to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of tax preparationVSAvoidaccuracy of tax return
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where taxpayer responses and preliminary data are continuously analyzed to adjust the interview flow. Based on feedback from initial answers and imported financial data, the system dynamically determines which additional questions are necessary to ensure completeness while maintaining brevity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as interview depth, question complexity, and sections included based on taxpayer-specific parameters like income level, filing status, and tax history. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system tailors the interview to each taxpayer's situation, ensuring neither omission nor unnecessary elaboration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a personalized tax interview is created for each taxpayer, then accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of tax assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of tax interview system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by customizing specific portions of the interview based on local taxpayer characteristics rather than creating entirely unique interviews. Common sections remain standardized while localized portions are personalized based on taxpayer data, balancing precision with system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes to control interview personalization by adjusting variables such as question selection, sequencing, and depth based on taxpayer parameters. This allows the system to achieve precision through controlled variation of interview parameters rather than complete customization of the entire interview structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10867356B2Simplified tax interview
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 HRB INNOVATIONS
  • US10867356B2 patent drawing
  • US10867356B2 patent drawing
  • US10867356B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method and media for providing a simplified, personalized tax interview to a user preparing a tax return for a taxpayer by determining which portions of a full tax interview are relevant to the return being prepared and then presenting only those relevant portions to the user. To make this determination, one or more prototypes (each representing one or more underlying characteristics associated with the return that inform the relevant portions of the tax interview) are determined for the return based on information already known before the tax interview is presented and may be updated based on information entered during the tax interview.