Personalized Video Generation Using Spatial-Temporal LoRA Adapters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional generative artificial intelligence models face challenges in accurately reproducing specific object appearances and movements based on textual inputs, often relying on large computational resources and struggling with overfitting, and struggle to disentangle subject appearance and motion effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves training a generative AI model with spatial and temporal adaptation blocks using cross-attention maps to separate foreground and background content, allowing for personalized video generation by fine-tuning with spatial and temporal LoRA adapters, and applying domain randomization techniques to enhance motion customization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional generative AI models are trained with large computational resources to improve generation accuracy, then video generation quality improves, but computational overhead and training cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo generation qualityVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The model is divided into a base model and separate adapters. The base model handles general video generation tasks with standard computational resources, while lightweight adapters handle personalization and fine-tuning. This segmentation allows high-quality generation without requiring the entire model to be retrained for each task, reducing overall computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of retraining the entire large model for different tasks or personalizations, the patent creates copies in the form of adapters that can be trained independently. These adapters copy and extend the capabilities of the base model without requiring computational resources proportional to the full model size, significantly reducing training cost and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If the model uses large number of parameters to improve generation accuracy, then video output quality improves, but the model becomes difficult to fine-tune and prone to overfitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo generation qualityVSAvoidfine-tuning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The model parameters are segmented into the base model (which remains frozen and general) and adapters (which are trained separately for specific tasks). This segmentation prevents overfitting by limiting the number of parameters that are actively trained for each task, while still maintaining the ability to generate high-quality videos through the combination of base model and adapters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of training the entire large model for each task (excessive action), the patent trains only the necessary adapter parameters (partial action). This partial training approach reduces overfitting risk while maintaining sufficient performance, as the adapter leverages the pre-trained knowledge of the base model without requiring full model retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the model trains with extensive fine-tuning data to prevent overfitting, then model accuracy improves, but training time and data requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The adapter creates a parameter-efficient copy that captures task-specific patterns without requiring extensive fine-tuning data. By copying relevant features from the base model and augmenting them with minimal task-specific parameters, the system achieves high accuracy with significantly reduced training time and data requirements compared to full model fine-tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter training strategy by freezing the base model parameters and only training adapter parameters. This parameter change approach reduces the effective number of parameters to be trained, thereby reducing training time and data requirements while maintaining model accuracy through the adapter's specialized parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If the model uses complex attention mechanisms to separate foreground and background, then generation accuracy improves, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforeground-background separation accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attention mechanism is segmented into spatial and temporal components, with the spatial adapter handling foreground-background separation and the temporal adapter handling motion consistency. This segmentation allows each adapter to focus on specific aspects of the generation task, improving accuracy while keeping individual adapter complexity manageable rather than requiring a single complex unified mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250356171A1Personalized output generation in generative artificial intelligence models
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250356171A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356171A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356171A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques and apparatus for generating visual content according to a textual prompt input into a generative artificial intelligence model. An example method generally includes receiving an input prompt specifying a video output to be generated by a generative artificial intelligence model. Based on a spatial portion of the generative artificial intelligence model and a cross-attention map generated based on the input prompt, a spatial attention map representing a subject of the video output to be generated by the generative artificial intelligence model is generated. Based on a temporal portion of the generative artificial intelligence model and the cross-attention map, a temporal attention map representing motion to be depicted by the subject of the video output to be generated by the generative artificial intelligence model is generated. The video output is generated based on the spatial attention map and the temporal attention map, and the generated video output is output.