Personnel Rating System Using Multi-Source Feature Calculation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing personnel auction systems primarily rely on qualification certificates, neglecting comprehensive evaluations that include work history and workplace evaluations.
Innovation Solution
A personnel rating system comprising a subject terminal device, an external evaluation device, and a personnel rating device connected through a communication network, which calculates feature information from personnel information and evaluation results to determine a comprehensive rating.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If a personnel rating system using a holistic approach is used, then the evaluation process is simple and easy to understand, but the evaluation results lack objectivity and consistency
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the holistic rating into multiple discrete components (e.g., knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors) that can be evaluated separately using standardized criteria. This allows the system to maintain the simplicity of a unified rating while achieving objectivity through structured breakdown of evaluation dimensions.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transforms the subjective holistic assessment into objective measurements by defining specific parameters and metrics for each evaluation dimension. This includes establishing standardized scales, weighted criteria, and quantifiable indicators that convert qualitative judgments into consistent, comparable data.
2Measurement precision
If a personnel rating system using analytical approach with multiple criteria is used, then the evaluation results are more objective and consistent, but the evaluation process becomes complex and time-consuming
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a universal evaluation framework that can be applied across different roles, departments, and evaluation contexts. The standardized criteria and structured process serve multiple functions simultaneously: ensuring objectivity, maintaining consistency, and enabling automated processing through computer implementation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces manual, complex analytical evaluation with computer-based automated processing. The system uses software to manage multiple criteria, calculate weighted scores, and generate evaluation results, thereby reducing the time and effort required while maintaining the rigor of multi-criteria assessment.
3Ease of manufacture
If traditional personnel rating methods are used, then the system is easy to implement, but it cannot effectively evaluate employee performance in modern business environments
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a dynamic evaluation system that can adapt to changing business requirements and modern work environments. The framework allows for flexible configuration of evaluation criteria, weights, and dimensions to match specific organizational needs, while maintaining a structured approach that ensures consistent implementation across the organization.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a personnel rating system including a subject terminal device, an external device that evaluates a subject, and a personnel rating device to which the subject terminal device and the external device are connected through a communication network, wherein the personnel rating device includes: a calculation unit that inputs personnel information of the subject acquired from the subject terminal device and evaluation results of the subject acquired from the external device and outputs feature information of the subject on the basis of the personnel information and the evaluation results; and a rating determination unit that determines a rating of the subject on the basis of the feature information output from the calculation unit.