Perturbation Method for Low-Resolution Measurement Normality Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in accurately testing the normality of data with low-resolution measurements, often leading to false rejections of distribution assumptions due to measurement rounding or truncation, which is costly and time-consuming, especially in sensitive applications like medical device testing.

Innovation Solution

A method that reintroduces variation into low-resolution measurements by iteratively computing perturbed values until a termination criterion is met, allowing for higher resolution and subsequent distribution testing using methods like the Anderson-Darling test to assess normality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If distribution testing is performed directly on low-resolution measurements, then the testing process is simple and fast, but false rejections of distribution assumptions occur due to measurement rounding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of distribution testingVSAvoidcomplexity of testing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing perturbation on the low-resolution measurements before conducting distribution testing. The method generates perturbed values that reintroduce variation lost due to rounding, then uses these perturbed values for the actual distribution testing. This preliminary perturbation step prevents false rejections while maintaining the simplicity of the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If higher resolution measurements are used, then measurement precision improves, but measurement cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution of measurementsVSAvoidtime for measurement and testing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by creating perturbed values that simulate what the measurements would look like at higher resolution. Instead of actually taking higher resolution measurements, the method copies the essential variation information through mathematical perturbation based on the known rounding interval. This provides the benefits of high-resolution analysis without the cost and time of actual high-resolution measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If iterative perturbation is performed to correct low-resolution measurements, then distribution testing accuracy improves, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of statistical resultsVSAvoidcomputational time for perturbation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing a limited number of perturbation iterations rather than exhaustive computation. The method generates perturbed values and performs distribution testing, using just enough perturbation to reintroduce the essential variation information needed to prevent false rejections. This avoids excessive computational time while achieving the reliability improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230161839A1Correcting low-resolution measurements
Publication Date: 2023.05.25 MINITAB INC
  • US20230161839A1 patent drawing
  • US20230161839A1 patent drawing
  • US20230161839A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems to correct low-resolution measurements corresponding to unobservable high-resolution measurements by introducing variation in the plurality of low-resolution measurements to obtain perturbed values for the low-resolution measurements. The perturbed values have a higher resolution than another resolution of the low-resolution measurements. A distribution test is performed on the perturbed values.