Feeding Deterrence in Agricultural Pests via Specific Compounds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural pests such as hemiptera, lepidoptera, and coleoptera cause significant damage to crops, with existing control methods like phosmet being toxic and harmful to bees, and traditional insecticides posing risks, necessitating a safer and more effective deterrent.

Innovation Solution

The use of specific compounds, such as those represented by structure (I), which are applied directly to crops or seeds, offering low mammalian toxicity and resembling naturally occurring materials, to deter feeding by pests like stink bugs, codling moth larvae, and granary weevils through contact, available in various formulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional insecticides like phosmet are used to control codling moth and other pests, then pest control effectiveness is improved, but toxicity to bees and mammals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest control effectivenessVSAvoidtoxicity to bees and mammals
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of insecticides by using compounds with specific molecular structures (formula I) that have inherently lower toxicity to bees and mammals while maintaining pest control effectiveness. The compounds feature specific functional groups and carbon chain lengths that reduce harmful effects on non-target organisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite chemical structures combining specific functional groups (ester, ketone, aldehyde) with hydrocarbon chains of defined lengths. This composite molecular design achieves both pest deterrence and reduced toxicity to beneficial insects and mammals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If pyrethrins are used to control granary weevils in stored food products, then pest control is achieved, but direct spraying on food is prohibited due to safety concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest controlVSAvoidsafety for direct food contact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical parameters by developing compounds with specific molecular weight ranges (formula I compounds) that are safe for direct food contact. These compounds can be applied directly to grains, seeds, and food products without the restrictions that apply to pyrethrins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional insecticides are applied to crops, then feeding deterrence is achieved, but environmental harm and non-target species damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding deterrenceVSAvoidenvironmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the principle of local quality by designing compounds that specifically target pest insects through their unique molecular structures, while being benign to non-target organisms. The specific functional groups in formula I compounds create selective action against pests without broad environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If traditional insecticide methods are used, then pest damage control is achieved, but cost and complexity of safe application increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest damage controlVSAvoidapplication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the application process by changing the chemical parameters to compounds that are inherently safer and easier to handle. The formula I compounds require fewer special precautions and application restrictions compared to traditional insecticides, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10111429B2Feeding deterrence in agricultural pests such as hemiptera, lepidoptera and coleoptera
Publication Date: 2018.10.30 BEDOUKIAN RESEARCH INC
  • US10111429B2 patent drawing
  • US10111429B2 patent drawing
  • US10111429B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compounds are used as agents that deter feeding of crops by agricultural pests such as hemiptera, lepidoptera and coleoptera, including, but not limited to, stink bugs, codling moth larvae and granary weevils. Feeding deterrence is obtained by contact of the insects with at least one of the compounds of the structure (I) wherein R is —OH, ═O, —OC(O)R4, —OR6, or —(OR6)2, wherein each R6, is independently an alkyl group containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms and R4 is a branched or straight chain, saturated or unsaturated, hydrocarbyl group with zero to two double bonds and from 1 to 15 carbon atoms; X is O or CH2 with the proviso that when X is OR can only be ═O; each Z is independently (CH) or (CH2); y is a numeral selected from 1 and 2; R1 is H or a branched or straight chain, saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group with zero to two double bonds and from 1 to 15 carbon atoms; R2 is H or a branched or straight chain, saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group with zero to three double bonds and from 1 to 15 carbon atoms; R3 is selected from H, a branched or straight chain, saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group with zero to three double bonds and from 1 to 15 carbon atoms, —(CH2)nOH, —C(O)OR5, —CH2C(O)OR7, —CH2C(O)R8, —C(O)NR9R10, and —CH2C(O)NR11R12 where each of R5, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11 and R12 is independently selected from H and a branched or straight chain, saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group with zero to three double bonds and from 1 to 15 carbon atoms and n is an integer of from 1 to 12; the bond between the 2 and 3 positions in the ring structure may be a single or a double bond; and wherein the compounds of structure (I) contain from 9 to 20 total carbon atoms in the compounds.