Pest Pressure Heat Maps Using Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pest pressure monitoring systems are inaccurate in predicting future pest pressures due to reliance on static logic and limited data visualization, often focused at individual farm levels with significant time lags and inadequate integration of multiple data types.

Innovation Solution

A network-based system using a heat map generation computing device that receives trap, weather, and image data, applies machine learning algorithms to generate predicted future pest pressure values, and displays dynamic time-lapse heat maps on mobile devices, integrating multiple data types for accurate and real-time monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If static logic and limited data types are used for pest pressure prediction, then system complexity is reduced, but prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data types (trap data, weather data, image data) and integrates them through machine learning algorithms to create a comprehensive pest pressure prediction system. This merging of diverse data sources and processing methods resolves the contradiction by achieving high prediction accuracy through integrated multi-source data analysis while managing system complexity through unified architectural design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms static logic into dynamic machine learning models that can adapt and learn from data. By changing from fixed prediction rules to adaptive algorithms that process multiple data types, the system achieves superior prediction accuracy while the modular implementation keeps complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If individual farm level monitoring is implemented, then data collection scope is reduced, but visualization quality and timeliness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisualization qualityVSAvoidmonitoring scope
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to operate at multiple scales simultaneously - it can provide detailed farm-level monitoring while also aggregating data for regional or landscape-level visualization. The heat map technology and machine learning models work effectively whether applied to a single farm or multiple farms, making the system universally applicable across different spatial scopes without sacrificing visualization quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If trap inspection frequency is increased, then data timeliness is improved, but time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata timelinessVSAvoidtime and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs automated trap inspection using image data and machine learning algorithms that can process and analyze trap contents without human intervention. The automated image recognition and pest identification enable continuous monitoring with minimal human time investment, achieving high data timeliness while reducing resource consumption compared to manual inspection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If multiple data types are integrated, then prediction comprehensiveness is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction comprehensivenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses machine learning algorithms as intermediaries to process and integrate multiple data types. These algorithms serve as mediators that automatically synthesize trap data, weather data, and image data into coherent pest pressure predictions. The intermediary processing layer manages the complexity of multi-source data integration while delivering comprehensive and reliable prediction results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12073496B2Systems and methods for pest pressure heat maps
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 FMC CORP
  • US12073496B2 patent drawing
  • US12073496B2 patent drawing
  • US12073496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating and displaying heat maps are provided. A heat map generation computing device includes a memory and a processor. The processor is programmed to receive trap data for a plurality of pest traps in a geographic location, the trap data including current and historical pest pressure values at each of the plurality of pest traps, receive weather data for the geographic location, receive image data for the geographic location, apply a machine learning algorithm to generate predicted future pest pressure values at each of the plurality of pest traps, generate a first heat map for a first point in time and a second heat map for a second point in time, and transmit the first and second heat maps to a mobile computing device to cause a user interface on the mobile computing device to display a time lapse heat map.