Forecasting Models for Effective Pest Severity Index

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Farmers face challenges in predicting pest severity and accurately accounting for natural enemies, leading to suboptimal pesticide application and potential crop damage due to over-use or under-use of pesticides.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates pest and natural enemies forecasting models based on weather and agronomic data, using participatory sensing and crowdsourcing inputs, to estimate an effective pest severity index, which optimizes pesticide application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If farmers use traditional pest monitoring methods, then they can identify pest presence, but they cannot accurately predict pest severity or account for natural enemies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest severity estimation accuracyVSAvoidforecasting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments pest monitoring into multiple specialized forecasting models: pest population forecasting models for different pest types (cotton bollworm, fruit and shoot borer, pink bollworm), natural enemies forecasting models, and severity index forecasting models. Each model handles specific aspects of pest dynamics, improving prediction accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces effective severity index as an intermediary metric that integrates pest population data, natural enemies data, and weather conditions. This intermediary provides a comprehensive measure of actual pest pressure on crops, bridging the gap between raw monitoring data and actionable pest management decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If farmers apply pesticides frequently to ensure pest control, then crop damage is minimized, but natural enemies are harmed and pesticide over-use occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest control reliabilityVSAvoidpesticide over-use damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where forecasted effective severity indices are continuously compared against economic threshold levels. Pesticide application recommendations are dynamically adjusted based on predicted pest-natural enemy interactions, ensuring chemicals are applied only when necessary and at optimal times, thereby maintaining control reliability while minimizing harmful over-application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary forecasting of pest severity and natural enemies population before pesticide application decisions are made. By predicting future pest pressure and natural enemy suppression levels, farmers can take preventive action only when forecasts indicate genuine risk, avoiding unnecessary pesticide applications that would harm natural enemies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If farmers reduce pesticide use to conserve natural enemies, then environmental impact is reduced, but pest severity may exceed control levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepesticide usage impactVSAvoidpest severity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the decision parameter from simple pest presence to effective severity index that incorporates natural enemies suppression levels. This parameter transformation allows the system to identify precise windows where pesticide reduction is safe (when natural enemies are active and effective severity is low) versus when intervention is necessary (when effective severity exceeds thresholds), achieving both reduced chemical impact and maintained control reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If farmers monitor all pest and natural enemy populations manually, then accurate data is collected, but time and labor requirements become excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepopulation data accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring time consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates multi-functional forecasting models that simultaneously predict multiple pest populations, natural enemies populations, and their interactions using integrated weather and agronomic data. This universal approach replaces numerous separate manual monitoring tasks with a single comprehensive forecasting system that provides accurate population estimates across all target organisms without proportionally increasing time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10555461B2Systems and methods for estimating effective pest severity index
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US10555461B2 patent drawing
  • US10555461B2 patent drawing
  • US10555461B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Presence of natural enemies has a considerable impact on pest severity in a given geo-location. However, manually estimating pest severity or population of natural enemies is cumbersome, inaccurate and not scalable. Systems and methods of the present disclosure enable estimating effective pest severity index by receiving a first set of inputs pertaining to weather associated with a geo-location under consideration; receiving a second set of inputs pertaining to agronomic information; generating a pest forecasting model and a natural enemies forecasting model based on the received first set and the second set of inputs for each pest; and estimating the effective pest severity index based on the generated models. The timing and quantity of pesticide application can be optimized based on the estimated pest severity index. The generated models can be further enhanced continually based on one or more of historical data, participatory sensing inputs, crowdsourcing inputs and management practices.