Pest Trap Sensor Fusion for Low-Cost Reliable Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pest detection traps using electronic noses are costly due to complex hardware and require substantial research and development, and are not widely adopted because of high costs and the need for fine-tuning VOC profiles for different local requirements.

Innovation Solution

A cost-effective pest detection trap using a combination of gas sensors for VOC data and non-gas sensors for environmental parameters, along with a data processing model like a neural network, to integrate and analyze both types of data for reliable pest detection and identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic noses (gas sensors) are used for pest detection, then detection capability is improved, but cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest detection capabilityVSAvoidsensor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines gas sensors (electronic noses) with non-gas sensors (acoustic, optical, mechanical sensors) into an integrated pest detection system. This merging allows the system to leverage multiple sensing modalities, where each sensor type compensates for the limitations of others, thereby maintaining high detection reliability while distributing the complexity across simpler, more affordable sensor components rather than relying solely on expensive electronic noses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If electronic noses are used for pest detection, then detection capability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest detection capabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pest detection function across multiple sensor types (gas sensors, acoustic sensors, optical sensors, mechanical sensors) rather than relying on a single expensive electronic nose system. Each sensor segment performs a specific aspect of pest detection, and the combined output achieves reliable pest identification. This segmentation allows the use of lower-cost individual sensor components while maintaining overall system effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs simpler, more affordable sensor components that can be manufactured at lower cost compared to expensive electronic noses. These include acoustic sensors, optical sensors, and mechanical sensors that are generally less costly and easier to manufacture. The system achieves reliable detection through the combination of these simpler sensors rather than depending on expensive, complex electronic nose hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Quantity of substance

If gas sensors alone are used, then VOC detection is achieved, but detection reliability is reduced due to dependency on air composition changes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVOC detectionVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces non-gas sensors (acoustic, optical, mechanical sensors) as intermediary detection mechanisms that provide additional information about pest presence independent of air composition. These intermediary sensors detect pests through alternative physical principles (sound waves, light reflection, mechanical movement) that are not affected by VOC concentration or air composition changes, thereby mediating and stabilizing the overall detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides reliable pest detection and identification at a lower cost by reducing the complexity of sensors and dependency on air composition changes, improving detection reliability and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

one or more gas sensors arranged to register airborne substances released in the capture compartment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVolatile organic compound detection:

Implementation Method 2

one or more non-gas sensors arranged to register one or more environmental parameters in the capture compartment and/or in the one or more entrances

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnvironmental parameter detection:

Implementation Method 3

providing the gas sensor data and the non-gas sensor data as inputs to the data processing model, and generating output data from the data processing model, wherein the output is indicative of presence or non-presence of the one or more pests

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeural network data processing:

Data Source

PatentEP4613095B1A method for detecting pests in a trap
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 ANTICIMEX INNOVATION CENT AS
  • EP4613095B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4613095B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4613095B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A method (700) for detecting one or more pests in a trap (100) is disclosed. The trap (100) comprises one or more entrances (102), a capture compartment (104), one or more gas sensors (106) arranged to register airborne substances released in the capture compartment (104) and one or more non-gas sensors (108) arranged to register one or more environmental parameters in the capture compartment (104) and/or in the one or more entrances (102), a control circuitry (110), comprising a processor (112) and a memory (114), arranged to control operation of the one or more gas and non-gas sensors (106, 108), and a data processing model (116) communicatively connected to the control circuitry (110). The method comprises obtaining (702) gas sensor data (204) indicative of the airborne substances using the one or more gas sensors (106), obtaining (704) non-gas sensor data (206) indicative of the one or more environmental parameters using the one or more non-gas sensors (108), providing (706) the gas sensor data (204) and the non-gas sensor data (206) as inputs to the data processing model (116), and generating (708) output data (208) from the data processing model (116), wherein the output is indicative of presence or non-presence of the one or more pests in the capture compartment (104).