PET Scanner Calibration Sheet Source Timing Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PET systems face challenges in precise timing calibration due to limitations with point and cylindrical sources, leading to indirect derivation of timing differences and increased scatter contributions, which result in reduced precision and higher count requirements.

Innovation Solution

A sheet source is used for calibration, providing direct coincidence event counts and reducing scatter, with the source being placed parallel to the scanner's central axis and rotated to ensure all lines of response intersect, allowing for more accurate and efficient timing calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a cylindrical calibration source is used, then all LORs can be covered, but the activity is distributed over a large range requiring more counts for the same precision

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLOR coverageVSAvoidcrystal timing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration source is segmented into multiple point sources positioned at specific locations, with each point source responsible for calibrating specific LORs. This segmentation allows concentrated activity at discrete points while collectively covering all necessary LORs, resolving the contradiction between coverage and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the calibration source have different properties - point sources are positioned and sized specifically for their local calibration task. Each point source provides concentrated activity locally where needed, rather than distributing activity uniformly throughout a large cylindrical volume, thereby maintaining precision while achieving coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If a point source is used, then timing precision can be achieved, but many valid LORs cannot be calibrated directly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming calibration precisionVSAvoidLOR coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple point sources are merged into a composite calibration source system. Each point source maintains its precision-calibration capability while the combination of multiple point sources at different positions provides comprehensive LOR coverage, resolving the contradiction between precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-point calibration source system serves multiple functions simultaneously - each point source calibrates specific LORs with high precision, and collectively the system provides universal coverage for all valid LORs in the scanner, making the calibration source both precise and universally applicable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a large cylindrical source is used, then LOR coverage is improved, but Compton scattering increases reducing measurement accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLOR coverageVSAvoidCompton scattering
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful scattered radiation component is extracted and eliminated by replacing the large cylindrical source with discrete point sources. The point sources minimize the volume through which photons must travel, thereby extracting and removing the Compton scattering problem while retaining the LOR coverage capability through strategic positioning of the point sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If indirect derivation is used for non-intersecting LORs, then calibration can be performed, but timing precision is reduced due to incidence angle variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration capabilityVSAvoidtiming difference precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration source is positioned and configured in advance so that all necessary LORs, including previously non-intersecting ones, directly intersect the appropriate point sources. This preliminary arrangement eliminates the need for indirect derivation, allowing direct timing measurements with full precision for all LORs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves more accurate timing calibration with reduced count requirements, correcting for incidence angles and minimizing scatter contributions, thereby improving calibration speed and precision.

Implementation Method 1

the visible scintillation photons travel slower than gamma photons in the scintillation crystal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Data Source

PatentEP3213119B1Pet detector timing calibration
Publication Date: 2019.12.11 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3213119B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3213119B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3213119B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A diagnostic imaging system comprises a plurality of radiation detectors (20) configured to detect radiation events emanating from an imaging region. The system comprises a calibration phantom (14) configured to be disposed in the imaging region spanning substantially an entire field of view and to generate radiation event pairs that define lines-of-response, wherein the calibration phantom is thin such that each LOR intersects the calibration phantom along its length, the thickness of the phantom being smaller than the length of the LORs. A calibration processor (24) receives input of the radiation detectors and calculates an incidence angle independent crystal delay Ʈ i for each detector. The calibration processor (24) constructs a first look-up table for the timing correction of each LOR and a second look-up table for the angle depth of interaction correction for each crystal by combining Ʈ i and η i