PET Scanner Coincidence Window Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PET imaging systems use a uniform coincidence time window for all lines of response (LORs), which can be too large for shorter LORs, leading to errors in determining coincidence events and reduced imaging quality.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determine multiple coincidence window width values based on specific characteristics of each LOR, such as length and incident angle, to improve the accuracy of coincidence event detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a uniform coincidence time window is set for all LORs based on the longest LOR, then the system can cover all possible LORs, but the coincidence time window becomes too large for shorter LORs, resulting in errors in determining coincidence events and reduced imaging quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of coincidence event determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of coincidence time window setting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the coincidence time window setting into multiple discrete values corresponding to different LOR length ranges. Instead of using a single uniform time window for all LORs, the system divides LORs into several length categories and assigns appropriate coincidence time window values to each category, thereby resolving the contradiction between coverage and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making the coincidence time window parameter adaptive to local characteristics of each LOR. Specifically, shorter LORs are assigned smaller coincidence time windows while longer LORs receive larger windows, allowing each LOR to have an optimized time window matched to its specific geometry rather than using a uniform global setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If a uniform coincidence time window is used for all LORs, then the system configuration is simple, but the imaging quality deteriorates due to incorrect coincidence determination for shorter LORs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of system configurationVSAvoidimaging quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the coincidence time window parameter based on LOR length characteristics. The system automatically selects appropriate coincidence time window values from a set of predefined options based on the measured LOR length, thereby improving imaging precision without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple coincidence time window values are determined based on LOR characteristics, then the precision of coincidence event identification improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of coincidence event detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of coincidence time window determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-establishing a mapping relationship between LOR length ranges and coincidence time window values. This mapping table is prepared in advance, allowing the system to quickly determine appropriate time windows during operation without complex real-time calculations, thus improving precision while controlling system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the precision and efficiency of identifying true coincidence events, reduces random events, and improves image quality by tailoring the coincidence time window to the specific geometry of each LOR.

Implementation Method 1

A tiny difference between the times when the two photons are detected may depend on the location of the annihilation position on the LOR. During a process for determining a coincidence event, when a first detector unit detects a first photon, a coincidence time window may be set for the other photon.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of Flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS20240402368A1Systems and methods for positron emission tomography imaging
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE
  • US20240402368A1 patent drawing
  • US20240402368A1 patent drawing
  • US20240402368A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may include obtaining photon information of photons that are emitted from an object and detected by detector units of a detector of a PET scanner. The method may also include obtaining, based on the photon information and lines of response (LORs), more than one coincidence window width value of the PET scanner. The method may also include determining coincidence events of the photons based on the more than one coincidence window width value.