Hot-Fill PET Container with Vertical Columns and Vacuum Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hot-filled PET containers face issues such as deformation due to vacuum pressure, poor gripping capabilities, susceptibility to buckling, and weight-related structural weaknesses during storage and transit, which affect their aesthetic appeal and mechanical integrity.

Innovation Solution

A hot-fillable, blow-molded plastic container design featuring vertical columns at corners for hoop strength and hand gripping, paired with recessed vacuum panels that accommodate pressure changes and reduce deformation, while arches enhance structural integrity and ease of handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PET containers are used for hot-filled products, then sterilization is achieved, but container deformation occurs due to vacuum pressure during cooling

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesterilizationVSAvoidcontainer deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The container sidewall is segmented into multiple vertical columns and vacuum panels. The vacuum panels are specifically designed to deform inward to accommodate vacuum pressure, while the vertical columns maintain structural integrity. This segmentation allows different parts of the container to perform different functions under vacuum conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the container are given different structural properties. The vacuum panels are designed with specific thickness and geometry to allow controlled deformation, while the vertical columns are reinforced to provide structural support. This local differentiation of structural quality enables the container to withstand vacuum pressure without overall deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If vertical ribs are added to increase container body strength, then structural integrity is improved, but container weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer body strengthVSAvoidcontainer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding multiple vertical ribs throughout the container, the design segments the sidewall into four strategic vertical columns positioned at specific locations. These columns provide the necessary structural support and moment of inertia to resist vacuum pressure and top loading, while minimizing the total amount of additional material required compared to a comprehensive rib structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vertical columns serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide structural support to resist vacuum pressure, increase the moment of inertia for buckling resistance, and create ergonomic gripping areas for users. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate features for each purpose, reducing overall material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the container is designed for secure gripping, then handling capability is improved, but structural integrity under vacuum pressure may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping capabilityVSAvoidstructural integrity under vacuum
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical columns are designed to simultaneously serve as structural support elements and ergonomic gripping features. Their placement and dimensions are optimized to provide both the necessary moment of inertia for vacuum resistance and the appropriate geometry for hand gripping, eliminating the need for separate structural and ergonomic features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The container sidewall is designed with localized vertical columns that have specific structural properties for vacuum resistance, while the spaces between columns are designed with vacuum panels that can deform to accommodate pressure differentials. This local differentiation allows gripping areas to maintain structural integrity while other areas accommodate vacuum pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If containers are stacked for storage and transit, then shipping efficiency is improved, but buckling and compression damage occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping efficiencyVSAvoidcontainer integrity under loading
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sidewall structure is segmented into vertical columns positioned to provide optimal structural support for stacked storage. These columns are strategically located to resist buckling forces and distribute vertical loads from stacked containers, maintaining integrity during shipping and storage while allowing efficient case arrangement and stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The container maintains structural integrity under vacuum pressure, provides secure gripping, and resists buckling and deformation, ensuring aesthetic appeal and usability even under weight and pressure changes.

Implementation Method 1

the vacuum panels can deform inward to an extent to equalize the pressure differential between the interior and exterior of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential:

Implementation Method 2

as the product cools to room temperature, a negative internal pressure or vacuum forms within the sealed container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS8113369B2Container
Publication Date: 2012.02.14 AMCOR RIGID PACKAGING USA LLC
  • US8113369B2 patent drawing
  • US8113369B2 patent drawing
  • US8113369B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A blow molded container has a neck portion defining a mouth. The neck portion leads into a shoulder portion and a bottom portion forms a container base. A sidewall portion connects the shoulder portion and the bottom portion and employs a first pair of opposing convex vacuum panels and a second pair of opposing convex vacuum panels. The first pair of opposing convex vacuum panels is larger in surface area than the second pair of opposing convex vacuum panels. A vertical column at each corner of the container joins the first pair of opposing vacuum panels to the second pair of opposing vacuum panels. A structural convex arch resides above and below each convex vacuum panel. Each of the vertical columns are molded into the structural convex arches. Vacuum initiator grooves may be molded into the first and second pair of opposing vacuum panels to control vacuum panel movement.