PET Container Shoulder Ribs for Top Load Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large format polyethylene terephthalate (PET) containers are financially uncompetitive due to their weight, which is necessary for withstanding distribution and filling stresses, and reducing material leads to structural weakness, while tall, steeply sloping shoulders increase costs and reduce shipping efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating ribs in the shoulder region that connect to vertical ribs on the sidewalls to transfer loads and provide additional structural support, maintaining container size while enhancing resistance to stresses, with shoulder ribs transforming from outward to inward facing and smaller ribs adding stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the amount of material used in the container is reduced to decrease weight, then weight is improved, but structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer weightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The container structure is segmented into multiple functional components: shoulder ribs extending from the neck region, vertical ribs running down the sidewalls, and smaller stabilizing ribs. This segmentation allows each rib element to bear specific loads, enabling the use of less material overall while maintaining structural strength through optimized load distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement is applied locally where stresses are highest - at the shoulder region and along vertical load paths - rather than uniformly throughout the entire container. The shoulder ribs and vertical ribs are strategically positioned to provide strength exactly where needed, allowing material reduction in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If tall, steeply sloping shoulders are used to meet stress constraints, then structural strength is improved, but container height increases reducing shipping efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress resistanceVSAvoidcontainer height
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing strength by extending the shoulder slope vertically (one dimension), the invention adds rib structures that extend vertically along the sidewalls (another dimension). This dimensional shift allows the container to maintain a compact height while achieving the required stress resistance through the vertical rib reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The shoulder region is segmented into multiple rib elements rather than relying on a single tall, sloping structure. This segmentation allows the strength function to be distributed across multiple smaller vertical elements, maintaining stress resistance without requiring increased overall container height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If heavy containers are used to withstand distribution and filling stresses, then structural strength is improved, but weight increases reducing financial competitiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress withstand capabilityVSAvoidcontainer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The container employs local quality by concentrating reinforcement only in the shoulder and vertical regions where stresses occur during filling and distribution. The rest of the container body uses lighter wall construction, achieving the necessary stress withstand capability without the penalty of uniform heavy construction throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The structural reinforcement is segmented into discrete rib elements rather than using a continuous heavy wall structure. This segmentation allows the container to achieve required strength through strategic placement of rib elements, significantly reducing overall weight compared to traditional heavy container designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10093444B2Large format container
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 RING CONTAINER TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10093444B2 patent drawing
  • US10093444B2 patent drawing
  • US10093444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a blow molded container including a bottom, four sidewalls extending upward from the bottom to a shoulder region, a neck disposed on the shoulder region and defining an opening at the top of the container, and vertical ribs extending from the shoulder region to the bottom along the sidewalls. The shoulder region includes shoulder ribs and a shoulder base portion, the shoulder ribs formed of should rib walls extending upward from the shoulder base portion and a shoulder rib top portion extending between shoulder rib walls to form an upper part of the shoulder ribs. Each shoulder rib extends from the neck to an upper part of a corresponding vertical rib to provide improved top load resistance at the top and neck of the container.