Mechanocatalytic PET Depolymerization With Solid Catalyst Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional chemical recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) faces economic challenges in depolymerization and separation costs, and existing mechanocatalytic methods lack scalability and efficiency in handling mixed-waste feedstocks.

Innovation Solution

A mechanocatalytic process using a solid depolymerizing catalyst, such as sodium hydroxide, combined with mechanical shearing in a ball mill, followed by nanofiltration and crystallization, to produce monomers from PET, with optional repolymerization and solvent recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional homogeneous catalysts are used for PET depolymerization, then depolymerization can be achieved, but separation costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization processVSAvoidseparation costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional homogeneous chemical catalysis with a mechanocatalytic system using solid catalysts in a ball mill. The mechanical energy from ball milling provides the activation energy for depolymerization, substituting the need for homogeneous acids or bases that require expensive separation processes. This resolves the contradiction by achieving depolymerization through mechanical means while eliminating separation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the catalytic function from homogeneous solutions and transfers it to solid catalyst particles that can be easily separated. By using solid NaOH or other solid catalysts in the ball mill, the catalytic activity is maintained while the solid catalyst can be simply filtered or decanted from the reaction mixture, eliminating the complex and costly separation processes required for homogeneous catalysts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If heterogeneous solid catalysts are used, then separation from products is easier, but sufficient catalyst-feed contact is challenging in solid feedstock conversion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst separationVSAvoidcatalyst-feed contact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The ball mill creates intense mechanical vibration and collision between the solid catalyst particles and PET feedstock. The grinding balls repeatedly impact and shear the catalyst-feed mixture, ensuring intimate contact between the solid catalyst surfaces and the polymer. This mechanical activation overcomes the limitation of poor contact in conventional heterogeneous catalysis while maintaining easy separability of the solid catalyst.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and energy parameters of the system by applying mechanical energy through ball milling. The mechanical forces generate local high-energy zones and transient temperatures that enhance catalyst activity and contact efficiency. This parameter change allows solid catalysts to effectively process solid feedstock without requiring complex slurry or melt systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional separation processes like distillation are used for PET recycling, then product separation is achieved, but energy and capital costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct separationVSAvoidseparation energy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes phase transition differences to achieve separation without energy-intensive distillation. The mechanocatalytic depolymerization produces monomers that can be separated from the solid catalyst and unreacted polymer through simple filtration and phase separation. The monomers are then purified through crystallization or extraction, leveraging their distinct phase behaviors at different temperatures and solubilities, avoiding the high energy costs of conventional distillation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces thermal separation processes (distillation) with mechanical and phase-based separation methods. The ball mill mechanically separates the solid catalyst from the liquid monomer products, and subsequent purification uses phase transitions and solubility differences rather than continuous heating and vaporization. This substitution dramatically reduces both energy consumption and capital equipment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If biological depolymerization by microbes/enzymes is used, then environmental compatibility is improved, but productivity and resistance to contaminants are significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoiddepolymerization rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces biological enzymatic systems with a mechanocatalytic system that uses mechanical energy and solid catalysts. This substitution maintains environmental compatibility by avoiding complex biological systems and their sensitivity to contaminants, while dramatically improving productivity through the high energy input of ball milling that rapidly depolymerizes PET regardless of feedstock quality or contamination levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates efficient and scalable recycling of PET into monomers, reducing separation costs and enabling continuous operation with low energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

mechanically shearing the combined polymers and the solid depolymerizing catalyst against each other to produce monomers from the polymers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical shearing: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

combining the polymers with a solid depolymerizing catalyst in a vessel, mechanically shearing the combined polymers and the solid depolymerizing catalyst against each other to produce monomers from the polymers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

followed by nanofiltration and crystallization, to produce monomers from PET

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNanofiltration: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 4

followed by nanofiltration and crystallization, to produce monomers from PET

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Data Source

PatentUS12528927B2Mechanocatalytic depolymerization of plastics
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 GEORGIA TECH RES CORP
  • US12528927B2 patent drawing
  • US12528927B2 patent drawing
  • US12528927B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for recycling polymers are provided. One embodiment provides a method for recycling synthetic polymers by combining the polymers with a solid depolymerizing catalyst in a vessel, mechanically shearing the combined polymers and the solid depolymerizing catalyst against each other to produce monomers from the polymers; and collecting the monomers. In some embodiments the solid depolymerizing catalyst is solid sodium hydroxide. In some embodiments collecting the monomers is achieved by contacting the sheared polymer and catalyst with a recyclable volatile solvent to dissolve the monomers. In some embodiments, the method includes purifying the collected monomers for repolymerization. In some embodiments purifying the monomers is achieved using nanofiltration membrane technology, cyclic fixed bed adsorption, simulated moving-bed adsorption or a combination thereof.