Channel Multiplexing for PET Detector Arrays Using Row-Column Signal Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing channel multiplexing methods for PET devices require a large number of electronic channels, leading to high costs and implementation difficulties, and result in poor signal-to-noise ratio due to the need for a wide dynamic range in reading detector signals.

Innovation Solution

A channel multiplexing method that divides detector signals into groups, uses row and column signal transmission lines with controlled signal nodes to differentiate signal positions, and acquires final pulse information from multiple nodes to reduce the number of electronic channels and dynamic range requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If channel multiplexing using resistor network is applied to reduce reading channels, then the number of electronic channels is decreased, but the dynamic range requirement of reading circuit increases due to different equivalent resistances for different detectors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of electronic channelsVSAvoiddynamic range requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides detector signals into row signals and column signals, creating separate signal paths that are processed independently. This segmentation allows each path to have optimized impedance characteristics, avoiding the need for a single resistor network to handle all detectors with different equivalent resistances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the traditional single-dimension channel multiplexing into a two-dimensional row-column signal processing architecture. By adding the column dimension, the system can identify detector positions through time differences in multiple directions, reducing the need for individual channels while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If normal processing circuit with finite dynamic range is used, then the circuit complexity is kept manageable, but signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates when inputting small signals and saturation occurs when inputting large signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit complexityVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting signals into row and column components that are processed separately, the patent reduces the dynamic range requirement for each processing path. The final detector identification is achieved by combining information from both paths, allowing normal processing circuits to operate within their optimal dynamic ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the need for high-dynamic-range analog processing with a system that uses time-domain information from multiple fixed-dynamic-range channels. The detector identification is achieved through temporal analysis rather than amplitude analysis, substituting the requirement for wide dynamic range with time-based processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10690788B2Channel multiplexing method for reading detector signal
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 RAYCAN TECH CO LTD SU ZHOU
  • US10690788B2 patent drawing
  • US10690788B2 patent drawing
  • US10690788B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A channel multiplexing method for reading array detector signals includes: dividing array detectors into M groups, at least two detectors being in each group; array coding the read channel to read M row signals and N column signals, which means when a signal is outputted at the detector in row a, column b, the signals of row a and column b are outputted correspondingly; connecting the readout signals of-the row and the column to different positions of two transmission lines respectively; determining the source row number and column number of the signal on the basis of the time difference between the time of signal reaching two ends of the transmission line, and marking the source detector from which the signal is generated on the basis of two time differences of the row signal and the column signal.