PET Detector Gap Arrangement for MR Bore Fit and Artifact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

PET/MRI systems face challenges in maximizing PET system diameter within the MR magnet while minimizing radial gaps between detectors, and high-density materials along the patient table cause PET imaging artifacts due to photon attenuation and scatter.

Innovation Solution

A PET detector arrangement with at least one non-uniform gap between detectors, aligned with high-density materials, and image reconstruction methods to compensate for the gap and attenuation effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If PET detectors are arranged to minimize radial gaps between detectors, then PET imaging quality is improved, but the PET system diameter becomes too large to fit within the MR magnet

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePET imaging qualityVSAvoidPET system diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by positioning PET detectors non-uniformly around the bore, with deliberately larger gaps at specific angular positions corresponding to high-density materials. This asymmetric arrangement allows the detector array to accommodate the fixed bore diameter within the MR magnet while minimizing gaps in regions where they would not interfere with imaging quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by varying the gap size between detectors based on their angular position. Detectors positioned away from high-density materials have smaller gaps to maintain imaging quality, while detectors near high-density materials have larger gaps to avoid alignment with attenuation sources. This localized optimization resolves the contradiction between minimizing overall gaps and fitting within the constrained diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Length of stationary object

If PET detectors are arranged to maximize PET system diameter, then bore diameter for receiving patient is improved, but radial gaps between detectors increase causing PET imaging artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebore diameterVSAvoidPET imaging quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric detector arrangement allows the system to maintain a larger bore diameter for patient comfort while compensating for increased gaps through strategic positioning. By placing larger gaps at specific angular positions away from critical imaging regions, the system achieves maximum bore diameter without sacrificing overall PET imaging quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by optimizing gap sizes at different angular positions rather than uniformly minimizing all gaps. This allows the system to maximize bore diameter while maintaining acceptable imaging quality in critical regions by having smaller gaps where they matter most for image formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If high-density shielded cables and support structures are included in the attenuation correction map, then PET photon attenuation is compensated, but scatter issues remain and cable movement creates positioning uncertainties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation correctionVSAvoidcable positioning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the problem of high-density material interference by deliberately positioning detector gaps to align with the locations of shielded cables and support structures. This extraction removes the interfering materials from the active detection zones, eliminating scatter issues and positioning uncertainties without requiring complex attenuation correction for moving components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of high-density materials into a beneficial arrangement by positioning detector gaps to align with cable and support structure locations. This transforms the potential source of artifacts into a structured design feature where the gaps naturally accommodate necessary infrastructure, turning a constraint into an advantage for system integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Length of stationary object

If PET detectors are positioned close to high-density materials, then system compactness is improved, but PET detectors are most affected by photon attenuation and scatter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compactnessVSAvoidphoton attenuation and scatter
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric positioning strategy allows the system to maintain compact overall dimensions while creating localized clearance between detectors and high-density materials. By positioning gaps at specific angular locations, the system achieves compactness in the radial direction while maintaining adequate spacing in angular directions where high-density materials are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by optimizing the spatial relationship between detectors and high-density materials at different angular positions. Detectors are positioned with appropriate spacing from attenuation sources where needed, while maintaining system compactness in regions where high-density materials are absent, thus resolving the contradiction between compactness and avoiding harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances image quality by minimizing radial gaps and reducing interference from high-density materials, allowing for cost-effective manufacturing and optimal bore diameter without image artifacts.

Implementation Method 1

PET/MRI is a hybrid imaging technology that uses MRI for soft tissue morphological imaging and PET for functional imaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositron emission: Radioactive Decay

Implementation Method 2

a set of n PET detectors arranged radially about the bore

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhoton detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

These high-density materials can cause PET photon attenuation and scatter issues that can lead to PET imaging artifacts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhoton attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 4

These high-density materials can cause PET photon attenuation and scatter issues

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompton scattering: Compton Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS12385997B2Arrangement of pet detectors for combined PET/MR systems
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA INC
  • US12385997B2 patent drawing
  • US12385997B2 patent drawing
  • US12385997B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A PET system for a PET/MRI machine is disclosed. The PET system includes a PET detector assembly arranged to form a single gap aligned with the high-density support structure assembly and the shielded cable assembly that run along the patient bed in the PET/MRI machine. The PET detector arrangement maximizes the allowable diameter of the PET system within the MR magnet and ensures that the high-density material does not interfere with image acquisition. Further, various image reconstruction techniques compatible with the PET detector arrangement are described.