PET Scanner Detector Normalization Without Solid Angle Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D positron emission tomography (PET) scanner efficiency normalization methods are complex and require multiple component factors, which can be impractical for all PET scanner designs, especially those with pixilated detector modules, and often necessitate solid angle corrections that complicate calibration processes.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for calibrating PET scanners using phantom sinogram data from solid cylinder and plane phantoms, determining crystal efficiency and detector geometry factors without solid angle corrections, and applying iterative smoothing techniques for accurate normalization, allowing for reduced complexity in 3D component efficiency normalization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional 3D component efficiency normalization methods are used, then detector normalization accuracy is improved, but device complexity and calibration difficulty increase due to multiple component factors and solid angle corrections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector normalization accuracyVSAvoidcalibration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the solid angle correction component from the traditional 3D component efficiency normalization method. By using a plane source phantom instead of a point source, the solid angle variation is removed, leaving only the detector efficiency factors to be determined. This simplification maintains normalization accuracy while reducing calibration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the phantom geometry parameter from a point source to a plane source configuration. This parameter change fundamentally alters the measurement geometry to eliminate solid angle corrections, transforming the normalization process from requiring multiple complex factors to needing only detector efficiency factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple component factors are used for 3D normalization, then normalization accuracy is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to impracticality for certain scanner designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenormalization accuracyVSAvoidcalibration practicality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal calibration method using plane source phantoms that works for all PET scanner designs, including pixilated detector modules. The plane source geometry provides a uniform response across all detector types, making the calibration process universally applicable without requiring design-specific modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the need for scanner design-specific calibration procedures by extracting the solid angle correction requirement. The plane source phantom approach provides a universal solution that works across different scanner geometries and detector configurations, greatly improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Loss of time

If direct efficiency normalization is used, then calibration speed is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to statistical accuracy concerns with large sinogram sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration timeVSAvoidstatistical accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the normalization process into two distinct parts: (1) determining detector efficiency factors using plane source phantoms with sufficient statistics, and (2) applying these factors to correct patient data. This segmentation allows the calibration phase to use larger phantom counts for accuracy while keeping patient scan times short.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs the statistically intensive normalization factor determination in advance using plane source phantoms. Once these factors are determined with high statistical accuracy, they can be applied repeatedly to patient data without requiring additional acquisition time, thus resolving the time-accuracy tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the calibration process by reducing the number of component factors needed for 3D PET scanner detector calibration, improving statistical accuracy and practicality across various PET scanner designs without requiring solid angle corrections, thus enhancing the efficiency and reliability of PET scanner image reconstruction.

Implementation Method 1

The PET detectors typically comprise crystals and photomultiplier tubes (PMT's), wherein the detector crystals, referred to as scintillators, convert the energy of a gamma ray into a flash of light that is sensed by the detector PMT.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Data Source

PatentUS7718954B2Component method and system for PET detector efficiency normalization
Publication Date: 2010.05.18 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US7718954B2 patent drawing
  • US7718954B2 patent drawing
  • US7718954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for calibrating a PET scanner is provided. First phantom sinogram data is acquired from a scan of a solid cylinder phantom within a PET scanner imaging FOV; second phantom sinogram data is acquired from a scan of a second solid plane or scanning line phantom within the PET scanner imaging FOV; and a PET scanner detector component scanner efficiency normalization is determined from at least one of the first and second sinogram data. In one aspect a crystal determining efficiency factor is determined as a function of phantom sinogram data without a solid angle correction, and a detector geometry factor is determined as a function of the crystal efficiency factor and phantom sinogram data. In one aspect a smoothed crystal efficiency normalization factor is determined from a noisy crystal efficiency factor through an iterative smoothing technique.