Automated Pet Feeding Station with RFID Identification and Portion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pet feeding methods are inconvenient and often lead to overeating or malnutrition, especially in multi-pet households where each pet has unique dietary needs and schedules, resulting in challenges in maintaining specific feeding regimens.

Innovation Solution

An automated feeding station system that uniquely identifies each animal using RFID tags and dispenses controlled portions of food according to predetermined feeding programs, tracking consumption and health metrics to ensure fair distribution and adherence to dietary needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated feeding systems are implemented, then feeding convenience and accuracy are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding convenienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated feeding system is divided into separate functional modules: RFID identification module, food storage hoppers, dispensing mechanisms, weighing systems, and control units. Each module performs a specific function independently, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while providing automated feeding convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A microprocessor-based control system acts as an intermediary between the RFID identification and food dispensing functions. The control system receives identification signals, queries the database for dietary requirements, calculates appropriate portions, and triggers the dispensing mechanism, thereby coordinating complex operations through a central intelligent mediator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple food types are stored for different pets, then dietary adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedietary adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feeding system incorporates multiple food hoppers that can store different types of food (dry food, wet food, treats) and are controlled by a universal dispensing mechanism. The same dispensing system can handle various food types by adjusting dispensing parameters, allowing one system to serve multiple dietary needs without requiring separate specialized equipment for each food type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts dispensing parameters based on the identified pet and food type. The microprocessor modifies dispensing speed, duration, and amount in real-time according to the specific dietary requirements retrieved from the database, enabling adaptable feeding without fixed mechanical configurations for each food type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If precise portion control is implemented, then feeding accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportion control accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates weighing mechanisms that provide feedback on the actual amount of food dispensed. The microprocessor compares the measured weight against the target portion size and can adjust subsequent dispensing operations to achieve precise portion control, using the feedback loop to maintain accuracy without requiring overly complex mechanical dosing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical portioning mechanisms with an electronic control system that uses sensors, microprocessors, and database lookups to determine and control portion sizes. This substitution of electronic intelligence for mechanical complexity achieves precise portion control through software algorithms rather than intricate mechanical dosing devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9795115B2Automated method and system for feeding animals
Publication Date: 2017.10.24 LIONESS FEEDING TECH
  • US9795115B2 patent drawing
  • US9795115B2 patent drawing
  • US9795115B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A feeding station for at least one animal, said feeding station comprising: at least one supply hopper having a food product; a food dispensing unit having means for dispensing controlled portions of said food product; a weigh hopper for receiving said food product from said food dispensing unit; a hemi-circular disc-shaped feeding platform for receiving said food product from said weigh hopper; a hemi-frustoconical sweeping member rotatable on a top surface of said hemi-circular disc-shaped feeding platform to remove unconsumed food product off said feeding platform after a feeding event.