PET Glycolysis Process With Two-Stage BHET Depolymerization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for recycling polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste are energy-intensive, time-consuming, and economically non-viable due to the high usage of ethylene glycol and costly catalysts, posing environmental concerns.

Innovation Solution

A process involving partial depolymerization of PET with ethylene glycol at a specific ratio and temperature, followed by depolymerization with reduced catalyst usage, to produce bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET) efficiently and cost-effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional glycolysis method is used for PET recycling, then complete depolymerization is achieved, but energy consumption and process time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization completenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The depolymerization process is divided into two distinct stages: (1) a first depolymerization stage using sub-stoichiometric ethylene glycol (0.3-1.0 equivalents) to break down PET into oligomers, and (2) a second depolymerization stage using stoichiometric or excess ethylene glycol (1.0-3.0 equivalents) to convert oligomers into monomers. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining complete depolymerization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first depolymerization stage performs preliminary breakdown of PET polymer chains into oligomers before the second stage converts these oligomers to monomers. This preliminary action reduces the complexity of the subsequent depolymerization step, allowing it to proceed faster and at lower energy input, thereby reducing total process time and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional glycolysis method is used for PET recycling, then complete depolymerization is achieved, but process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization completenessVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The process is segmented into two time-efficient stages: first stage (0.5-4 hours) for oligomer formation, and second stage (1-6 hours) for monomer production. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized for its specific chemical transformation, achieving complete depolymerization faster than conventional single-stage methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The preliminary oligomerization step simplifies the polymer structure before final monomer production, making the second stage more efficient. This preliminary action reduces the time required for complete depolymerization by preparing the material in a more reactive state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If conventional glycolysis method is used for PET recycling, then depolymerization is achieved, but ethylene glycol and catalyst usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization efficiencyVSAvoidethylene glycol and catalyst usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The first depolymerization stage uses sub-stoichiometric amounts of ethylene glycol (0.3-1.0 equivalents), which is partial action sufficient for oligomer formation. This reduces glycol consumption compared to conventional methods that use excess glycol from the beginning. The catalyst is also used in optimized quantities (200-1000 ppm zinc acetate or 10-50 ppm antimony trioxide) to achieve the desired conversion without excessive usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The process design allows for recovery and recycling of unreacted ethylene glycol and catalyst from the reaction mixture. The segmented approach enables better separation and recovery of these materials, reducing overall consumption and waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Reliability

If conventional glycolysis method is used for PET recycling, then depolymerization is achieved, but economic viability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization efficiencyVSAvoideconomic viability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By using partial (sub-stoichiometric) amounts of expensive reagents like ethylene glycol and catalyst in the first stage, and optimized amounts in the second stage, the overall material cost is reduced. This makes the process more economically viable while maintaining depolymerization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The process enables recovery and reuse of unreacted ethylene glycol and catalyst, reducing material costs. The segmented design facilitates easier separation and recovery of these valuable materials, improving the overall economics of the recycling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process reduces ethylene glycol and catalyst usage, shortens the depolymerization time, and enables safe, environmentally friendly recycling of PET waste at an industrial scale.

Implementation Method 1

glycolysis of waste PET fiber was carried out under nitrogen atmospheric condition with excess ethylene glycol (EG) as glycolysis agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlycolysis: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

reacting the polymer at a temperature of about 250° C. or more and at a pressure of 1 mmHg or less in presence of deglycol catalyst such as a metal compound catalyst to form the monomers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepolymerization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

maintaining temperature of the mixture in a range of 200° C. to 250° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

in presence of a depolymerization catalyst at a temperature ranging from 170° C. to 200° C. for a time period ranging from 2 hours to 5 hours to produce crude product mixture comprising bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS12617748B2Process for recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (pet) waste
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 ECOSIS LTD (
  • US12617748B2 patent drawing
  • US12617748B2 patent drawing
  • US12617748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a process for production of bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET) from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) comprising: (a) effecting partial depolymerization of PET by mixing PET with ethylene glycol in a weight ratio ranging from 1:0.3 to 1:1.5 maintaining temperature of the mixture in a range of 200° C. to 250° C. to obtain a partially depolymerized PET; and (b) effecting depolymerization of the partially depolymerized PET by contacting the partially depolymerized PET with ethylene glycol in a weight ratio of PET:ethylene glycol ranging from 1:1 to 1:4 in presence of a depolymerization catalyst at a temperature ranging from 170° C. to 200° C. for a time period ranging from 2 hours to 5 hours to produce a crude product mixture comprising bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET). The present disclosure also provides a process for recycling of PET from PET waste.