PET/MR Image Registration with Dynamic Reference Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing PET/MR imaging methods struggle with motion artifacts due to patient movement, particularly in dynamic PET imaging where tracer distribution changes, leading to inaccurate image registration and quality degradation.

Innovation Solution

A method for dynamic PET/MR imaging that updates the reference frame throughout the scan by incorporating recently co-registered images, prioritizing dominant motion parameters and dividing the field of view into sections for individual motion correction, using PET data for real-time motion estimation and MR sequence updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single static reference frame is used for co-registration, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision (registration accuracy) deteriorates when tracer distribution changes during acquisition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereference frame update mechanismVSAvoidregistration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by transitioning from a static reference frame to a dynamic reference frame that is continuously updated throughout the PET acquisition. The reference frame is regenerated at predetermined time points using recently co-registered frames, allowing it to adapt to changing tracer distribution. This dynamic update mechanism resolves the contradiction by introducing necessary complexity to maintain high registration accuracy when tracer distribution evolves during the scan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the most recently co-registered frames to update the reference frame. This feedback loop ensures that the reference frame continuously reflects the current tracer distribution, improving registration accuracy. The system monitors co-registration quality and uses this information to regenerate the reference frame at appropriate intervals, balancing the need for accuracy with computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the reference frame is dynamically updated throughout the scan, then the manufacturing precision (registration accuracy) is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration accuracyVSAvoidreference frame update mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by updating the reference frame at predetermined time points during the PET acquisition rather than continuously. This periodic update strategy maintains high registration accuracy while reducing computational complexity compared to continuous updates. The system balances the frequency of reference frame regeneration to match the dynamics of tracer distribution changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by incorporating only the most recently co-registered frames (e.g., 1-3 frames) to update the reference frame, rather than using all available data. This partial update approach maintains registration accuracy while reducing the computational burden of processing the entire dataset, thus managing device complexity effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If optical camera systems are used for real-time motion tracking, then the measurement precision of head motion is improved, but the PET signal quality deteriorates due to camera attenuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead motion tracking accuracyVSAvoidPET signal attenuation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the motion tracking function from the optical camera system and implements it using PET data itself. By deriving motion information from the PET frames through co-registration analysis, the system eliminates the need for external camera systems that cause signal attenuation. This extraction of the motion tracking function resolves the contradiction by removing the harmful attenuation effect while maintaining motion measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses PET data as an intermediary to obtain motion information without requiring direct optical measurement. The co-registration of PET frames serves as the intermediary process that indirectly measures head motion while avoiding the harmful effects of camera systems. This intermediary approach maintains measurement precision while eliminating signal attenuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250325243A1Method for Rigid Motion Correction of PET and MR Images on PET/MR Scanners
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US20250325243A1 patent drawing
  • US20250325243A1 patent drawing
  • US20250325243A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for combined PET/MR imaging performs a PET/MR scan using a PET/MR scanner. During the scan a frame is reconstructed and co-registered with a reference frame. The reference frame is dynamically updated throughout the PET/MR scan by incorporating most recently co-registered images from previously reconstructed frames.