Truncation Compensation in PET/MR Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current truncation compensation methods in PET/MR imaging do not accurately adapt to specific locations and characteristics of truncation in the human body, leading to unreliable results.

Innovation Solution

A truncation compensation system that uses a unique classification technique to identify anatomical structures outside the MR field of view, masks PET imaging data with MR data to generate compensated regions of interest, and applies specific algorithms for each type of truncation, adapting to different body parts and field of view constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single algorithm is applied to the entire human body for truncation compensation, then the processing is simplified, but the accuracy and reliability of compensation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm complexityVSAvoidtruncation compensation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the human body into multiple anatomical regions (head, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, limbs) and applies region-specific truncation compensation algorithms to each segment. This segmentation allows the system to account for the unique characteristics of truncation in different body parts, thereby improving compensation accuracy while maintaining manageable algorithmic complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements location-adaptive truncation compensation where the compensation parameters and algorithms are tailored to specific anatomical locations. Each region has its own compensation strategy based on local tissue density, organ distribution, and typical truncation patterns, ensuring that the compensation accuracy is optimized for each specific location rather than using a one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If truncation compensation adapts to specific body parts and truncation characteristics, then the accuracy improves, but the algorithm complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetruncation compensation accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic adaptation where the truncation compensation algorithm automatically adjusts its parameters and approach based on the detected anatomical region and specific truncation characteristics. The system dynamically selects and configures compensation strategies according to the patient's anatomy and the location of truncation, achieving high accuracy without requiring manually configured complex algorithms for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The truncation compensation system performs self-characterization by automatically analyzing the truncated PET/MR images to identify anatomical regions and truncation patterns. The algorithm self-adjusts its compensation parameters based on the detected characteristics, eliminating the need for manual intervention or pre-programming of specific compensation strategies for different body parts, thus reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If every incoming dataset is treated as a black box with a single algorithm, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of compensation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidtruncation compensation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary characterization of each incoming PET/MR dataset by automatically detecting anatomical regions and truncation patterns before applying compensation. This preliminary analysis step prepares the data by identifying key features and selecting appropriate compensation strategies, ensuring reliable results while keeping the overall process automated and easy to operate without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the detected anatomical characteristics and truncation patterns inform the selection and adjustment of compensation algorithms. The algorithm continuously adapts based on feedback from image analysis, ensuring reliable compensation results. This feedback-driven approach maintains operational simplicity as the system automatically adjusts based on detected conditions without requiring user input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11922604B2Classified truncation compensation
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US11922604B2 patent drawing
  • US11922604B2 patent drawing
  • US11922604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

PET/MR images are compensated with simplified adaptive algorithms for truncated parts of the body. The compensation adapts to a specific location of truncation of the body or organ in the MR image, and to attributes of the truncation in the truncated body part. Anatomical structures in a PET image that do not require any compensation are masked using a MR image with a smaller field of view. The organs that are not masked are then classified as types of anatomical structures, the orientation of the anatomical structures, and type of truncation. Structure specific algorithms are used to compensate for a truncated anatomical structure. The compensation is validated for correctness and the ROI is filled in where there is missing voxel data. Attenuation maps are generated from the compensated ROI.