PET Processing with Real-Time Additive Dosing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The processing of PET raw materials results in significant property variations and high scrap rates due to raw material inconsistencies, with existing methods failing to effectively manage or reduce these issues, particularly in recycling and re-introduction of post-consumer PET into production streams.

Innovation Solution

Employing real-time process management and machine learning to dynamically adjust the dosing of homogenizing composition and chain extenders using liquid additives as carriers, allowing for continuous monitoring and adaptive control of PET processing, including the use of a mechanical-hydraulic system with sensors and a programmable logic controller to optimize additive mixing ratios and material performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional PET processing methods are used, then production efficiency is maintained, but scrap rates increase to 4-6% due to raw material variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidscrap rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of processing parameters (temperature, pressure, additive dosing) based on real-time monitoring of raw material properties. The system adapts processing conditions to match variations in PET batch quality, preventing scrap formation while maintaining continuous production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time monitoring and feedback mechanisms that continuously measure material properties during processing and automatically adjust parameters to compensate for variations. This closed-loop control prevents defect formation and reduces scrap rates while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of substance

If real-time process management and machine learning are implemented, then scrap rates reduce by 75%, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescrap rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs machine learning algorithms that automatically learn optimal processing parameters from historical data and real-time measurements without requiring manual intervention. The system self-adjusts to material variations, reducing scrap rates while the automation masks the underlying complexity from operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual process adjustment and traditional control systems with automated machine learning-based control. This substitution of mechanical/manual operations with intelligent algorithms reduces scrap through precise parameter optimization while the complexity is contained within the software layer rather than requiring complex physical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If liquid additives are used for property enhancement, then material performance improves, but ability to rescue faulty blends is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial performanceVSAvoidfaulty blend rescue capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts additive dosing rates and types based on real-time material property measurements. When faults or variations are detected, the system can modify the composition and amount of liquid additives in real-time to compensate for deviations, maintaining both performance precision and adaptability to faulty blends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical or chemical parameters of the liquid additives (concentration, type, dosing rate) in response to real-time material conditions. This allows the system to optimize material performance while simultaneously adapting to and correcting faulty blends through parameter modification rather than fixed additive formulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3720682B1Pet processing method
Publication Date: 2024.05.29 CRAIG DOUGLAS
  • EP3720682B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The invention addresses the above problems by tuning PET raw material processing process by employing real time process management and machine learning steps and reactive addition of dosing of homogenizing composition for impregnating chain extenders and compatibilizing agents in thermoplastic resin using the liquid additive as a carrier into the process for modifying material performance. The properties of PET blend are no longer fixed once dry-blending and melting is complete.