PET Reconstruction Using MLEM with Latent Variables

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PET image reconstruction methods discard a significant number of coincidences, particularly those involving tissue scattered photons, and require additional radiation exposure and dedicated equipment for obtaining the photon attenuation map, which is not feasible in combined PET/MRI scanners.

Innovation Solution

A method using the Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization (MLEM) algorithm with latent random variables to reconstruct intra-patient tissue activity distribution and photon attenuation map, incorporating Time of Flight data and Single Scatter Approximation, and accounting for detector scatter by setting a low energy threshold or incorporating scatter events into the MLEM method.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If transmission scan is used to obtain photon attenuation map, then attenuation map accuracy is improved, but patient radiation exposure increases and scan time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation map accuracyVSAvoidpatient radiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent recovers and utilizes scattered coincidences that were previously discarded in conventional PET reconstruction. By incorporating these scattered photons into the reconstruction algorithm through the MLEM method with scatter modeling, the system obtains attenuation information without requiring additional transmission scans, thus avoiding extra radiation exposure while maintaining attenuation map accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the PET emission data itself to generate the attenuation map through iterative reconstruction algorithms that model scatter and attenuation processes. This self-service approach eliminates the need for separate transmission scans, reducing patient radiation exposure while providing accurate attenuation correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If transmission scan is used to obtain photon attenuation map, then attenuation map accuracy is improved, but overall scan time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation map accuracyVSAvoidoverall scan time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the attenuation map acquisition process with the emission data reconstruction process. By combining scatter correction and attenuation correction into a single iterative MLEM reconstruction framework, the system obtains both activity distribution and attenuation map simultaneously from emission data, eliminating the need for separate transmission scans and reducing total scan time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The iterative MLEM reconstruction continuously utilizes all available coincidence data (including scattered coincidences) to progressively refine both activity and attenuation estimates. This continuous utilization of data throughout the reconstruction process eliminates idle time associated with separate transmission scans while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If true coincidences only are used for reconstruction, then reconstruction accuracy is improved, but number of usable coincidences decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconstruction accuracyVSAvoidnumber of usable coincidences
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts harmful scattered coincidences into beneficial data sources. By modeling the scatter process and incorporating scattered coincidences into the MLEM reconstruction algorithm, the system transforms previously harmful events into useful information for both activity distribution and attenuation map reconstruction, increasing the number of usable coincidences while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reconstruction parameters by introducing scatter modeling capabilities and using a probabilistic approach to distinguish true and scattered coincidences. This allows the system to utilize a broader range of coincidence events with appropriate weighting, increasing the effective number of usable coincidences while preserving reconstruction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If scattered coincidences are incorporated into reconstruction, then number of usable coincidences increases, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of usable coincidencesVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reconstruction process into distinct components: scatter modeling, attenuation correction, and activity reconstruction. By separating these functions and using iterative MLEM updates that process different coincidence types through structured forward and back-projection operations, the system manages computational complexity while incorporating scattered coincidences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial scatter correction by modeling only the dominant scatter processes (single scatter approximation) rather than all possible scatter events. This partial approach captures the most significant scatter effects while limiting computational complexity, allowing incorporation of scattered coincidences without excessive computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the number of useful coincidences, results in a separable likelihood function for easier maximization, and allows for parallel reconstruction with a modest increase in computational complexity, effectively addressing measurement errors and incorporating a priori information from MRI data.

Implementation Method 1

the numbers of photon pairs emitted from an electron-positron annihilation inside a voxel that arrive into two given voxels along a Line of Response (LOR)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron-positron annihilation:

Implementation Method 2

incorporating Time of Flight (TOF) data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of Flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 3

incorporating a priori information from MRI data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic Resonance Imaging:

Implementation Method 4

tissue scattered coincidences where only one of the two photons is scattered and is scattered only once

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompton scattering: Compton Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS11058371B2Simultaneous attenuation and activity reconstruction for positron emission tomography
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US11058371B2 patent drawing
  • US11058371B2 patent drawing
  • US11058371B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of PET image reconstruction is provided that includes obtaining intra-patient tissue activity distribution and photon attenuation map data using a PET/MRI scanner, and implementing a Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization (MLEM) method in conjunction with a specific set of latent random variables, using an appropriately programmed computer and graphics processing unit, wherein the set of latent random variables comprises the numbers of photon pairs emitted from an electron-positron annihilation inside a voxel that arrive into two given voxels along a Line of Response (LOR), where the set of latent random variables results in a separable joint emission activity and a photon attenuation distribution likelihood function.