Underwater Granulation of PET with Surface Crystallization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) granules are complex, costly, and lack control over crystallization, leading to sticking issues during handling.

Innovation Solution

A method involving underwater granulation, where granules are crystallized only on the surface in a process fluid at an optimized temperature and pressure, with turbidity measured to determine crystallization degree, allowing for amorphous interiors and easy processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If granulated PET material is produced by conventional methods, then granulation is achieved, but the granules clump together at temperatures above 70°C requiring complex crystallization processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegranulation processVSAvoidcrystallization process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing crystallization during the granulation process itself, rather than as a separate subsequent step. The granulation and crystallization operations are combined into one integrated process, where the granules are crystallized in situ within the granulator, eliminating the need for separate crystallization equipment and reducing overall process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges two previously separate processes (granulation and crystallization) into a single integrated operation. By combining these steps, the patent eliminates the need for separate crystallization equipment and reduces the number of process stages, directly addressing the contradiction between ease of manufacture and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If the degree of crystallization is determined by density measurements, then crystallization assessment is achieved, but the measurement process becomes relatively complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystallization degreeVSAvoidmeasurement process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical density measurement systems with a simplified optical or electrical detection method. By using a probe that measures properties such as light transmission or electrical characteristics, the system can determine crystallization degree without requiring complex density measurement equipment, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an indirect measurement approach where a physical property (such as optical density or electrical conductivity) that correlates with crystallization degree is measured instead of directly measuring density. This creates a simplified proxy measurement system that maintains measurement precision while reducing the complexity of the measurement device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If underwater granulation is used, then granule production is achieved, but the granules require subsequent crystallization to prevent sticking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegranule production rateVSAvoidcrystallization equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines granulation and crystallization into a single integrated process unit. The crystallization function is built into the granulator, allowing both operations to occur simultaneously in one device, thereby eliminating the need for separate crystallization equipment while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs crystallization as a preliminary action during the granulation process itself, before the granules are discharged. This ensures that crystallization is completed in advance, preventing sticking issues during subsequent handling without requiring additional equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If the process fluid temperature is optimized for maximum crystallization rate, then surface crystallization is achieved, but the interior of granules remains amorphous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface crystallization controlVSAvoidgranule structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different structural zones within the granules: a crystallized surface layer and an amorphous interior. By optimizing the process fluid temperature for maximum crystallization rate, the patent achieves controlled surface crystallization while the interior remains amorphous, giving different regions of the same object different properties suited to their functional requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces granules that are simple, cost-effective, reproducible, and non-sticky, with controlled crystallization enabling efficient further processing.

Implementation Method 1

Crystallizing the granules in the process fluid. In the crystallization step, only the surface of the granules is crystallized, leaving the interior of the granules amorphous.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 2

After the crystallization step, the turbidity of the surface of the granules is determined as a measure of the degree and depth of crystallization achieved.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering/Turbidity: Scattering

Data Source

PatentEP2533958B1Method for producing granules from polyethylene terephthalate
Publication Date: 2020.04.15 MAAG AUTOMATIK GMBH

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for producing granules from polyethylene terephthalate by generating a melt of polyethylene terephthalate material, generating granules from the melt by means of underwater granulation in a process fluid, conducting the granules away from the site of the underwater granulation in the process fluid, crystallizing the granules in the process fluid, discharging the granules in the process fluid, and separating the granules from the process fluid, wherein only the surface of the granules is crystallized in the crystallization step such that the inside of the granules remains amorphous, wherein the temperature of the process fluid is set to a value at which, depending on the formulation of the polyethylene terephthalate material, the previously experimentally determined maximum crystallization rate of the polyethylene terephthalate material of the granules is achieved, and wherein after the crystallization step, the turbidity of the surface of the granules is determined as a measure of the achieved crystallization degree and of the achieved crystallization depth on the surface of the granules.