Petaloid Base Feet Geometry for Carbonated Container Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional petaloid base designs for plastic containers do not adequately withstand extreme pressures, such as those from carbonated beverages, especially when manufactured at high speeds, leading to potential breakage and instability.

Innovation Solution

A one-piece plastic container with a petaloid base featuring a contact diameter ratio of 70-74%, contact area ratio of 20-23%, and fillet radius of 4-10 mm, composed of biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate, which includes a nub and corner transition portions to enhance stability and pressure resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional petaloid base designs are used, then manufacturing is simple, but the base cannot withstand extreme pressures from carbonated beverages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure resistanceVSAvoidbase structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base structure incorporates feet with specific geometric parameters (contact diameter ratio of 0.65-0.75, contact area ratio of 0.20-0.30) to concentrate and distribute pressure locally, enhancing pressure resistance in critical areas without requiring overall structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The feet are designed with curved surfaces and rounded contact points rather than flat or sharp edges, allowing for better pressure distribution and stress concentration management, which improves the base's ability to withstand extreme pressures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional petaloid base designs are used, then manufacturing is simple, but the container exhibits insufficient stability when empty and filled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer stabilityVSAvoidbase geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base design features feet with optimized contact area ratios (0.20-0.30) and contact diameter ratios (0.65-0.75) to maximize stability in critical support areas while keeping the overall base geometry relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The base geometry is pre-designed with specific dimensional ratios during manufacturing to ensure inherent stability, eliminating the need for additional stabilizing features or post-manufacturing adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If conventional petaloid base designs are used, then production speed can be high, but breakage resistance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreakage resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The feet are designed with optimized geometric parameters including contact diameter ratio (0.65-0.75), contact area ratio (0.20-0.30), and fillet radius (4-10 mm) to enhance breakage resistance while remaining compatible with high-speed injection molding processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If the base is designed with larger contact area, then stability increases, but the container volume capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidcontainer volume capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The base design concentrates the contact area into specific feet regions with optimized contact area ratios (0.20-0.30), providing maximum stability with minimum base material usage, thereby preserving container volume capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly increases resistance to breakage and stability, both empty and filled, while maintaining performance at high production speeds, as evidenced by improved 'time to failure' in stress crack resistance tests.

Implementation Method 1

Mechanical processing involves orienting the amorphous material to achieve strain hardening. This processing commonly involves stretching an injection molded PET preform along a longitudinal axis and expanding the PET preform along a transverse or radial axis to form a PET container.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain hardening: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

PET is a crystallizable polymer, meaning that it is available in an amorphous form or a semi-crystalline form. The ability of a PET container to maintain its material integrity relates to the percentage of the PET container in crystalline form, also known as the 'crystallinity' of the PET container.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Data Source

PatentUS7891513B2Container base with feet
Publication Date: 2011.02.22 AMCOR RIGID PACKAGING USA LLC
  • US7891513B2 patent drawing
  • US7891513B2 patent drawing
  • US7891513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A one-piece plastic container includes a body defining a longitudinal axis and having an upper portion, a sidewall portion and a base portion. The base portion defines a plurality of feet extending therearound. The base portion defines a contact diameter ratio of approximately 70-74% and a contact length ratio of approximately 20-23% for a plastic container having a volume capacity of approximately one (1) liter (1000 cc). According to additional features, the one-piece plastic container can have a nub defined on the base portion. For a one-piece plastic container having a volume capacity of approximately one (1) liter (1000 cc), the nub has a diameter of approximately 3-7 mm (0.12-0.28 inch), the base portion defines a contact area ratio of approximately 23-25%, and each foot defines corner transition portions each having a fillet radius of approximately 4-10 mm (0.16-0.39 inch).