PETRA MRI Sequence k-Space Trajectory Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance sequences with ultrashort echo times, such as the PETRA sequence, face challenges in achieving optimal contrast and signal-to-noise ratio due to limitations in scanning techniques, particularly in radial and Cartesian k-space scanning methods, which affect image quality.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting the number of radial spokes to be measured in the PETRA sequence, ensuring that measurement points closest to the center of k-space are acquired at an optimal time after a pre-pulse, thereby stabilizing contrast and improving signal-to-noise ratio without disrupting the original workflow, and modifying the k-space trajectory to prioritize center-proximal measurement points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If radial scanning is used for the first region of k-space with phase coding gradients ramped up before excitation pulse, then echo time is shortened and acquisition speed is improved, but the central region of k-space cannot be scanned and contrast optimization is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition speedVSAvoidcontrast optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides k-space into two distinct regions: a first region scanned radially with phase coding gradients for ultrashort echo time acquisition, and a second central region scanned Cartesian for optimized contrast. This segmentation allows each region to be acquired with the most appropriate method for its specific requirements, resolving the contradiction between speed and contrast optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different scanning strategies are applied to different regions of k-space based on their specific needs. The peripheral region uses radial scanning for speed, while the central region uses Cartesian scanning with pre-pulses for contrast optimization. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by allowing each region to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If pre-pulses are radiated for T1 contrast enhancement, then contrast is improved, but additional wait time is required which increases total acquisition time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrast enhancementVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pre-pulses only to the Cartesian scanning of the second central region of k-space, rather than to the entire k-space acquisition. This segmentation allows contrast enhancement where it is most needed (central region) while minimizing the time penalty, as pre-pulses are not required for the faster radial scanning of the first region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying pre-pulses to the entire k-space acquisition, the patent applies them partially only to the second region scanning. This partial action achieves contrast enhancement for the most critical central region while avoiding the full time penalty that would result from applying pre-pulses to all regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If Cartesian scanning is used for the second central region of k-space, then contrast is optimized, but additional transformation steps are required increasing processing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrast optimizationVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the k-space acquisition into two regions with different scanning methods. The second central region is scanned Cartesian to provide optimized contrast, and this segmented approach isolates the processing complexity to only the portion of data that requires it, rather than complicating the entire acquisition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances image acquisition quality by optimizing contrast and signal-to-noise ratio, minimizing gradient jumps, and maintaining the sequence's noise reduction advantages, leading to improved image quality with minimal modifications to the existing workflow.

Implementation Method 1

The invention concerns a method for image acquisition with a magnetic resonance device using a magnetic resonance sequence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance:

Implementation Method 2

at least two phase coding gradients have already been ramped up completely before administration of the excitation pulse

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase encoding:

Implementation Method 3

a non-selective radio-frequency excitation pulse radiated by a radio-frequency transmission/reception device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 4

A first region, which does not include the center of k-space, is scanned by at least two phase coding gradients being initially switched (activated) in respective spatial directions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field gradient: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS9696399B2Method and magnetic resonance apparatus for image acquisition
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US9696399B2 patent drawing
  • US9696399B2 patent drawing
  • US9696399B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method and magnetic resonance apparatus for image acquisition using a magnetic resonance sequence in which k-space corresponding to the imaging area is scanned, a first region of k-space, which does not include the center of k-space, is scanned radially along a number of spokes emanating from the k-space center, and at least two phase coding gradients are completely ramped up before the excitation pulse. A second central region of k-space, which remains without the first region, is scanned in a Cartesian manner. For contrast increase a pre-pulse is provided before a predetermined number of individual measurements. The number of spokes is selected so a measurement point nearest to the k-space center is measured at a predetermined point in time after the pre-pulse, which is optimal for signal-to-noise ratio and/or contrast.