Multi-Stage PFAS Separation Column with Porous Trays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for removing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from water are inefficient, energy-intensive, and generate significant secondary waste, with limitations in removing short-chain PFAS and high operating costs due to high gas injection requirements in foam fractionation and air sparging methods.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage separation column system with porous trays and spargers that inject air at multiple stages to produce small bubbles, maximizing air-water contact time and surface area for enhanced PFAS removal, while minimizing gas hold-up and operating costs, using a customizable tray design with controlled bubble sizes and flow rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional foam fractionation with single-stage gas injection is used, then a large foam fractionate is produced for PFAS removal, but high operating costs and high energy consumption occur due to high volume gas injection

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal quantityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The single-stage gas injection system is segmented into multiple stages with multiple spargers positioned at different heights in the column. Each sparger injects gas at a specific location to create small bubbles that rise through defined path lengths, dividing the treatment process into discrete segments that collectively achieve PFAS removal with reduced total gas volume and lower energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Duration of action of moving object

If conventional air sparging with large bubbles is used, then air is injected into groundwater for PFAS removal, but very short contact time results in ineffective PFAS removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact timeVSAvoidPFAS removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The bubble size parameter is changed from large bubbles in conventional sparging to small bubbles through controlled gas injection at multiple spargers. This parameter change increases the surface area to volume ratio and extends the contact time between gas-liquid interface and PFAS contaminants, thereby improving removal efficiency while maintaining reasonable gas injection rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If conventional methods with high gas injection are used, then PFAS removal is achieved, but significant secondary waste is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS removal quantityVSAvoidsecondary waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of injecting high volumes of gas throughout the entire column (excessive action), the system uses multiple spargers to inject moderate gas volumes at specific locations and heights (partial action). This targeted approach creates sufficient air-water contact for PFAS removal while minimizing excess gas that would form large foam fractions requiring disposal, thereby reducing secondary waste generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves high PFAS removal efficiency with reduced energy consumption and waste production, allowing for effective treatment of a wide range of PFAS concentrations and scalable implementation in water treatment plants.

Implementation Method 1

A multi-stage separation column system with porous trays and spargers that inject air at multiple stages to produce small bubbles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBubble formation: Bubble

Implementation Method 2

inject air at multiple stages to produce small bubbles, maximizing air-water contact time and surface area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir sparging: Sparging

Implementation Method 3

A multi-stage separation column system with porous trays and spargers that inject air at multiple stages to produce small bubbles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFoam fractionation: Foam

Implementation Method 4

A multi-stage separation column system with porous trays and spargers that inject air at multiple stages to produce small bubbles, maximizing air-water contact time and surface area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity separation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 5

A multi-stage separation column system with porous trays and spargers that inject air at multiple stages to produce small bubbles, maximizing air-water contact time and surface area for enhanced PFAS removal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11447401B1Separation columns for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) remediation
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 ARROWHEAD CENTER INC
  • US11447401B1 patent drawing
  • US11447401B1 patent drawing
  • US11447401B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Separation columns and methods for PFAS removal from water resources. Each column comprises perforated trays, level-controlled gates and air spargers placed on the top of each tray. Air bubbles of optimum size injected on the surface of each tray rise to the top of each tray, separating PFAS, thus creating a PFAS-enriched foam at the top. The amount of air or other gas injected at each stage of the column is optimally determined to increase the gas-water contact time and decrease enriched foam production. The foam is collected from the surface and undergoes a simple low-pressure evaporation process to break the bubbles. Multi-stage air injection using a sparger or distributer to inject air or other gas bubbles in each tray produces higher turbulence on each tray and more fresh and small bubbles of controlled size along the column height, thus enhancing contaminant removal and reducing operating costs.