Thermal Oxidizer for PFAS Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a pressing need for effective and efficient processes and apparatuses to remove and convert poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) due to their persistence in the environment and harmful health effects.

Innovation Solution

The process involves oxidizing liquid PFAS in a thermal oxidizer and then treating the oxidation effluent in a zone that may include a dry sorbent injection zone, a wet scrubber zone, a carbon bed, a selective catalytic reaction zone, and/or an ion exchange zone, allowing for direct injection of PFAS streams without separate vaporizing equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If liquid PFAS is directly injected into the thermal oxidizer without separate vaporizing equipment, then the device complexity is reduced and residence time is minimized, but the manufacturing precision and control of vaporization may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus sizeVSAvoidvaporization control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the vaporization function directly within the thermal oxidizer by injecting liquid PFAS onto hot surfaces or into the combustion zone, eliminating the need for a separate vaporizing equipment unit. This integration reduces overall device complexity while maintaining effective PFAS destruction through the high-temperature oxidation environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If multiple treatment zones (dry sorbent injection, wet scrubber, carbon bed, selective catalytic reaction, ion exchange) are implemented, then the purification effectiveness is improved, but the device complexity and treatment time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment zone complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the treatment process into multiple sequential zones: dry sorbent injection zone for initial contaminant capture, wet scrubber zone for chemical neutralization, carbon bed for adsorption, selective catalytic reaction zone for targeted degradation, and ion exchange zone for final polishing. Each zone addresses specific types of contaminants through specialized mechanisms, achieving comprehensive purification while allowing modular design and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If thermal oxidation is performed at high temperature (500°C to 2,300°C) for complete PFAS destruction, then the conversion efficiency is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePFAS conversion efficiencyVSAvoidthermal energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a multi-stage temperature approach where the thermal oxidizer operates at high temperatures (500°C to 2,300°C) for complete PFAS destruction, while subsequent treatment zones operate at progressively lower temperatures. The dry sorbent injection, wet scrubbing, and catalytic zones handle remaining contaminants at reduced thermal energy requirements, optimizing the balance between conversion efficiency and energy consumption by matching treatment intensity to contaminant concentration at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves thermal oxidation of 90 to 99.9999% of PFAS, with treatment zones effectively reducing fluoride species concentrations, thereby minimizing environmental impact and health risks.

Implementation Method 1

The PFAS may be oxidized in a thermal oxidizer and then the oxidation effluent is subjected to a treatment in a treatment zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

oxidizing, in an oxidation zone, a feed stream comprising liquid PFAS to provide an oxidation effluent comprising a reduced amount of liquid PFAS

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

The treatment zone may include a dry sorbent injection zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 4

The treatment zone may include the wet scrubber zone, and the process may also include mixing an aqueous caustic stream with the oxidation effluent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 5

The treatment zone may include the carbon bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 6

The treatment zone may include an ion exchange zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon exchange: Ion Exchange

Implementation Method 7

The treatment zone may include a selective catalytic reaction zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20250050156A1Processes and apparatuses for converting poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 UOP LLC
  • US20250050156A1 patent drawing
  • US20250050156A1 patent drawing
  • US20250050156A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes and apparatuses converting poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). An oxidation reaction zone, preferably a thermal oxidizer, is utilized to oxidize the PFAS into anionic fluoride species. A treatment zone is utilized on at least a portion of the oxidation zone effluent before the oxidation zone effluent is vented or otherwise released to the atmosphere. The treatment zone may include a dry sorbent injection zone; a selective catalytic reduction zone, a wet scrubber zone; a carbon bed; an ion exchange zone; or any combination thereof.