Phantom Traffic Jam Detection With Target Speed Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Phantom traffic jams occur due to chain reactions of vehicles slowing down without apparent cause, leading to prolonged traffic congestion, especially on highways and expressways, where drivers are unable to determine the cause of the jam and are unable to speed up without delays.

Innovation Solution

A traffic reduction system that identifies phantom traffic jams by analyzing sensor data from vehicles and infrastructure components, determining a target speed for vehicles to maintain appropriate following distances, and providing real-time indications to drivers or vehicle control systems to adjust their speed and reduce traffic congestion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If vehicles maintain close following distances to improve road capacity, then traffic flow efficiency improves, but phantom traffic jams occur due to chain reactions of sudden braking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow efficiencyVSAvoidtraffic flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the speeds and distances of surrounding vehicles, then providing real-time guidance to drivers to maintain optimal following distances. This feedback loop prevents the chain reaction of sudden braking that causes phantom traffic jams, while still allowing vehicles to travel closely together for improved road capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the recommended following distance parameter based on real-time traffic conditions, vehicle speeds, and densities. By optimizing this parameter continuously, the system maintains traffic flow efficiency while preventing the conditions that lead to phantom traffic jams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If drivers slow down to maintain safe following distances, then collision risk decreases, but traffic congestion increases due to reduced overall speed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidaverage traffic speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the following distance parameter dynamically based on traffic conditions, allowing drivers to maintain shorter safe distances in light traffic (increasing speed) and automatically increase distance in heavy traffic (maintaining safety). This resolves the contradiction by making safety margins adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system makes following distance a dynamic parameter that adjusts in real-time based on traffic flow, vehicle speeds, and densities. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain safety while optimizing for speed, preventing the need for uniform speed reductions that cause congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If vehicles travel at varying speeds to respond to individual driving conditions, then driving comfort improves, but phantom traffic jams are more likely to occur due to speed variations triggering chain reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving comfortVSAvoidtraffic flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to drivers about their speed relative to the optimal speed for maintaining stable traffic flow. This allows drivers to maintain comfort while subtly adjusting their speed to prevent chain reactions, achieving both comfort and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system anticipates potential chain reactions by monitoring traffic patterns and provides early guidance to drivers to adjust their speed before conditions deteriorate. This beforehand cushioning prevents phantom traffic jams while allowing natural speed variations for driver comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11928961B2Phantom traffic jam detection and avoidance
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11928961B2 patent drawing
  • US11928961B2 patent drawing
  • US11928961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To reduce the effects of traffic jams, a traffic reduction system identifies road segments having more a threshold amount of traffic. The traffic reduction system also receives an indication of a current location of a client device operating in a vehicle and compares the current location to the locations of the identified road segments to determine whether the vehicle is on or approaching the road segment. If the vehicle is on or approaching the road segment, the traffic reduction system determines a target speed for the vehicle to maintain an equal distance between the vehicle and the vehicle in front of the vehicle and the vehicle and the vehicle behind the vehicle. The traffic reduction system then provides the target speed to the client device for display on a user interface. By maintaining equal distances between vehicles in front of and behind each other, the amount of traffic dissipates.