Reverse Distribution System for Pharmaceutical Credit Disbursement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reverse distribution in industries, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector, faces challenges such as scarcity of convenient shipping options, complexity in tracking items and credit flow, and varied pricing options, making it difficult to implement accurately and efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A reverse distribution system that facilitates the collection, sorting, and shipment of items to appropriate manufacturers, along with precise tracking and disbursement of credits, using a computer system that organizes items by customer and manufacturer, generates refund estimates, and adjusts pricing and policy data based on actual credit memoranda.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual and automated techniques are used for forward distribution, then distribution efficiency is improved, but reverse distribution remains complicated and difficult to implement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution efficiencyVSAvoidreverse distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the reverse distribution process into distinct functional modules: item receipt and data capture, sorting by manufacturer identity, tracking management, credit memorandum processing, and disbursement calculation. Each module handles a specific aspect of reverse distribution, making the overall complex process manageable and automatable through standardized software components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reverse distribution system acts as an intermediary platform between customers (pharmacies, hospitals) and manufacturers. It receives items and data from customers, coordinates with manufacturers for credit memoranda, and manages the entire reverse distribution workflow, thereby simplifying the process for end users while maintaining accurate tracking and accounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If items are collected from multiple customers and sorted by manufacturer, then tracking accuracy is improved, but processing time and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data capture and organization when items are first received at the warehouse. Item characteristics, customer information, and manufacturer identifiers are recorded and sorted in advance, creating a structured database that enables rapid subsequent processing and matching with credit memoranda without requiring time-consuming manual sorting later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual sorting and tracking mechanisms with automated computer-based tracking and data management. Software algorithms automatically match received items with manufacturer credit memoranda based on stored identifiers, eliminating the need for manual sorting while maintaining high tracking accuracy and reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If credit memoranda are matched with line item information, then disbursement accuracy is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisbursement accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal database structure and matching algorithm that handles multiple manufacturers, customers, and item types through a single integrated platform. The same core matching logic applies regardless of the specific manufacturer or customer, allowing accurate disbursement calculations without requiring separate complex systems for each transaction type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses standardized data templates and formats for credit memoranda and line item records. By copying and matching structured data fields (item identifiers, quantities, prices) between the received item database and manufacturer credit memoranda, the system achieves accurate disbursement calculations through systematic data comparison rather than complex custom processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If refund estimates are generated using historical data and pricing information, then estimate quality is improved, but data processing and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimate qualityVSAvoiddata storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores historical refund data, pricing information, and manufacturer credit patterns in a structured database during normal operations. This preliminary data accumulation enables rapid generation of accurate refund estimates by querying pre-processed information rather than calculating from raw data each time, improving estimate quality while managing storage efficiently through data aggregation and summarization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8719048B1Method and apparatus for accurate estimation and disbursement in a reverse distribution environment
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 RETURNS R US LLC
  • US8719048B1 patent drawing
  • US8719048B1 patent drawing
  • US8719048B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An efficient and accurate technique for facilitating reverse distribution of pharmaceutical items between customers and manufacturers includes receiving, from the customers, pharmaceutical items returnable for credit to the corresponding manufacturers, identifying similar items based on the national drug code and possibly other criteria to define line items, grouping items according to manufacturer identity, and sending the items to the appropriate manufacturers. The technique further includes receiving credit memoranda from the manufacturers specifying the amount of credit due for the returned items, generating actual amount payable for each item based on the line items and the credit memoranda, and generating disbursement statements for the customers.