Pharmacy Filling Workflow Using Computer-Guided Technician Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems are inadequate in supporting pharmacy product prescription filling by non-registered pharmacists or technicians, as they lack the necessary tools for accurate and consistent verification processes, often requiring the involvement of a registered pharmacist.

Innovation Solution

A pharmacy computing system that regulates the filling process and provides an interactive inspection process between technicians and computers, allowing non-registered pharmacists or technicians to fill prescriptions with reduced reliance on registered pharmacists, incorporating authentication and sensor technologies for accuracy and accountability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If registered pharmacists perform all filling and verification tasks, then accuracy and accountability are maintained, but productivity is reduced and customer service quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling accuracyVSAvoidpharmacist availability for customer service
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the filling process into distinct functional segments: technicians perform product verification (comparing physical products against the prescription), while registered pharmacists handle supervisory functions and customer service. This segmentation allows non-registered personnel to perform routine verification tasks, freeing registered pharmacists for higher-value activities while maintaining accuracy through role specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated computer system as an intermediary between technicians and the verification process. The computer provides real-time guidance, displays prescription details, and records verification data, enabling technicians to perform accurate verification without requiring registered pharmacist involvement in each transaction. This intermediary maintains accountability while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If non-registered pharmacists or technicians perform filling tasks, then productivity increases, but measurement precision and reliability of verification deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling throughputVSAvoidproduct verification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the computer provides real-time verification guidance to technicians, comparing their observations against prescription requirements. The system records all verification data and provides immediate feedback on correctness, enabling technicians to maintain high accuracy levels through structured guidance and monitoring rather than relying solely on individual expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables technicians to independently perform verification tasks using computer-guided protocols. The computer provides step-by-step instructions and decision support, allowing technicians to self-manage the verification process with standardized procedures that ensure consistency and accuracy across all transactions without requiring registered pharmacist intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If a single technician performs both filling and verification, then productivity increases, but reliability deteriorates due to lack of independent verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling efficiencyVSAvoidverification independence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The computer system acts as an independent intermediary verifier that objectively checks all filling and verification activities against prescription requirements. It provides structured guidance, records all actions, and maintains an audit trail, effectively serving as the independent verification mechanism that replaces the traditional second-human-check model while enabling single-technician operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of dual-technician verification with an automated computer-based verification system. The computer executes verification logic, compares physical products against prescription data, and provides guidance, substituting human-to-human verification with a more reliable and consistent automated system that eliminates bias and human error while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8145501B1System and method for performing pharmacy product filling using non-registered pharmacists
Publication Date: 2012.03.27 WALGREEN CO
  • US8145501B1 patent drawing
  • US8145501B1 patent drawing
  • US8145501B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method and system provides a single-role pharmacy product filling workflow that coordinates filling and inspection to increase the accuracy and consistency of released pharmacy products.