Pharmacy Intervention Eligibility Determination System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pharmacy computer systems face challenges in processing and tracking patient intervention information associated with interventions like medication therapy management, particularly in notifying pharmacies about eligible services during medication fills or refills, and in timely communication of service information to providers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that facilitate determining and communicating intervention services, such as medication therapy management, by using a network of computers including sponsor, service provider, and pharmacy computers, which process healthcare transactions, generate patient intervention service forms, and capture intervention information for reporting, ensuring timely notification and storage of intervention data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional pharmacy computer systems are used for processing healthcare transactions, then basic prescription processing is maintained, but the system cannot effectively determine and communicate patient eligibility for intervention services during medication fills or refills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to determine and communicate intervention service eligibilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct modular components: a determination module that identifies eligible patients during transaction processing, a communication module that notifies pharmacies, and a tracking module that monitors service delivery. This segmentation allows traditional pharmacy systems to gain intervention service capabilities without complete system replacement, resolving the contradiction between enhanced adaptability and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The determination module is designed to work within existing healthcare transaction processing frameworks while simultaneously identifying patients eligible for multiple types of intervention services (Medication Therapy Management, Pharmaceutical Care, etc.). This multi-functionality enables a single system addition to serve diverse intervention needs without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If intervention service eligibility is determined during healthcare transaction processing, then timely notification of eligible services is achieved, but additional processing steps increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification timing of intervention eligibilityVSAvoidtransaction processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The determination module performs eligibility assessment during the existing healthcare transaction processing workflow, identifying eligible patients before the transaction is completed. By embedding the determination logic within the established transaction flow rather than adding separate post-processing steps, the system achieves timely notification without proportionally increasing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary determination module that sits between the transaction processing system and the pharmacy notification system. This intermediary captures transaction data, performs eligibility determination, and triggers notifications, thereby adding the necessary processing steps while maintaining a clean separation of concerns and manageable system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If service information is captured and communicated to pharmacy ownership and service providers, then complete tracking of intervention services is achieved, but communication delays occur in traditional systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of intervention service informationVSAvoidcommunication delay of service information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking module establishes continuous electronic communication channels between the determination module, pharmacy systems, and service provider systems. Service information is transmitted and updated in real-time or near-real-time throughout the intervention service delivery process, eliminating the communication delays and information gaps that occur with traditional batch processing or manual reporting methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where service provider communications about delivered interventions are automatically captured and transmitted back to the determination module and pharmacy systems. This continuous feedback mechanism ensures all stakeholders have access to current service status information, achieving complete information tracking without manual intervention or delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10430555B1Systems and methods for determining and communicating information to a pharmacy indicating patient eligibility for an intervention service
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 MCKESSON CORPORATION
  • US10430555B1 patent drawing
  • US10430555B1 patent drawing
  • US10430555B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for determining and communicating intervention service opportunities, such as medication therapy management services, that may be available for a patient, as part of processing a healthcare claim transaction. A healthcare claim transaction, such as a prescription benefit request transaction, may be received by the service provider computer from a healthcare provider computer. The service provider computer may determine if an intervention service is available for the patient and if an available intervention service notification has been transmitted to the pharmacy computer prior to the service provider computer receiving the healthcare claim transaction. The service provider computer may receive an approved adjudicated response and generate a patient intervention service form corresponding to the available intervention service for the patient. The service provider computer may transmit the patient intervention service form to the pharmacy computer and receive a completed patient intervention service form from the pharmacy computer.