Online Pharmacy Legitimacy Prediction Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for verifying the legitimacy of online pharmacies are either consumer-dependent or impractical to maintain, and can be manipulated by illicit operators, posing risks to public health and the integrity of the pharmaceutical supply chain.

Innovation Solution

An automated algorithmic method using a k-nearest neighbor prediction model that assesses the legitimacy of online pharmacies based on publicly available data, including backlinks and web mining techniques, to filter search engine results and minimize the classification of illicit sites as legitimate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If white-list verification systems are used to ensure pharmacy legitimacy, then consumer safety is improved, but consumer convenience deteriorates due to requiring extra verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepharmacy legitimacy verificationVSAvoidconsumer convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables search engines to automatically verify pharmacy legitimacy through algorithmic analysis of website content and backlinks, eliminating the need for consumer-initiated verification steps. The search engine itself performs the safety check by comparing pharmacies against the prediction model, making the process transparent and automatic for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-identifies and flags illicit pharmacies before consumers encounter them through search results. By maintaining an updated prediction model and proactively filtering results, the system performs verification in advance rather than requiring reactive consumer checks, thus improving both safety and convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If black-list systems are used to block illicit pharmacies, then consumer protection is improved, but the system becomes impractical to maintain due to the dynamic nature of online commerce

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer protectionVSAvoidblacklist maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static blacklist to a dynamic prediction model that continuously learns and adapts. The algorithmic approach automatically updates as new data becomes available, eliminating the manual maintenance burden while improving detection capability against evolving illicit pharmacy tactics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual curation of blacklists with automated algorithmic analysis. The prediction model uses machine learning to analyze website content, backlinks, and other digital footprints, substituting human effort with computational processes that scale automatically without increasing maintenance complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If textual content analysis is used to classify online pharmacies, then automated classification is achieved, but the system can be easily manipulated by illicit operators to affect prediction results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated classificationVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system moves beyond analyzing only the pharmacy website's own content to examining the broader dimensional context of backlinks and referral relationships. By analyzing the website's position within the larger web ecosystem and its connections to other sites, the system creates a more robust classification that is harder to manipulate through simple content changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses backlinks and referral websites as intermediary indicators of pharmacy legitimacy. Rather than directly trusting or distrusting pharmacy website content, the algorithm analyzes the reputation and characteristics of external sites that link to the pharmacy, using these intermediaries as proxies for assessing legitimacy in a way that is more resistant to manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive verification systems are implemented, then pharmacy legitimacy is accurately determined, but the system complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegitimacy assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a tiered verification approach where the prediction model provides initial classification, and only cases requiring higher confidence or additional investigation trigger more comprehensive analysis. This partial action approach achieves sufficient precision for most cases without the full complexity of exhaustive verification for every pharmacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10672048B2System and method for determining the legitimacy of online pharmacies
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 THE PENN STATE RES FOUND INC
  • US10672048B2 patent drawing
  • US10672048B2 patent drawing
  • US10672048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of assessing the legitimacy of a subject pharmacy website includes the steps of, from a network-enabled computing device, generating a prediction model comprising a list of pharmacy websites of known legitimacy and a first set of websites which contain at least one referring link to at least one of the list of pharmacy websites of known legitimacy, from the network-enabled computing device, collecting a second set of websites which contain at least one referring link to a subject pharmacy website whose legitimacy is unknown, isolating a subset of websites from the second set of websites based on the prediction model, comparing the subset of websites to the first set of websites linked to the list of pharmacy websites whose legitimacy is known, and determining the legitimacy of the subject pharmacy website based on the comparison to the first set of known legitimate pharmacy websites.