Pharmacy Prior Authorization Pre-Approval Through Automated Claim Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing process of pharmacy prior authorization (PA) requires significant time and effort, often resulting in delays and inefficiencies due to manual and electronic processing routines that lack data integration and require multiple parties to transmit and store unnecessary information, leading to delayed treatment.

Innovation Solution

A pharmacy claim processing system utilizing a prior authorization pre-approval (paPA) computing device that automates the administration of pharmacy prior authorizations by querying a database with prescriber and healthcare plan data to apply pre-approval rules, appending approval data elements to claim transaction messages, and transmitting approval messages to pharmacy claims processors or clearinghouses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual prior authorization processing is used, then flexibility in handling complex cases is maintained, but processing time increases significantly and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprior authorization processing speedVSAvoidtime required for PA process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-populating prior authorization forms with data already available in the electronic health record system. Prescriber information, patient data, and clinical details are automatically retrieved and inserted into the PA form before submission, eliminating manual data entry and reducing processing time while maintaining accuracy for complex cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple parties are involved in transmitting information, then comprehensive review is achieved, but data consistency deteriorates and unnecessary information is transmitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of reviewVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple information sources (electronic health record, pharmacy management system, prior authorization database) into a single integrated electronic form. This consolidation ensures that all parties review the same standardized data set, eliminating data consistency issues while maintaining comprehensive review through the integrated system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fax and phone transmission methods are used, then system compatibility is maintained, but processing efficiency decreases and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compatibilityVSAvoidclaim processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical transmission methods (fax machines, phone calls, physical form handling) with an electronic data transmission system. The prior authorization form is submitted and processed electronically through integrated software interfaces, eliminating transcription errors and significantly improving processing efficiency while maintaining compatibility through standardized electronic data formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If prescribers provide unnecessary information, then completeness of application is improved, but processing time increases and complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of applicationVSAvoidPA process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the necessary information elements required for prior authorization processing from the electronic health record. By selectively retrieving and presenting only relevant clinical data, patient information, and prescription details in a standardized format, the system ensures completeness of required information while eliminating unnecessary data that increases complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250239346A1Systems and methods for automated administration of healthcare plan pre-approved pharmacy prior authorizations
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 CAPER BERRY LLC
  • US20250239346A1 patent drawing
  • US20250239346A1 patent drawing
  • US20250239346A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are pharmacy claim transaction processing systems and methods. A method for pre-approval of a prior authorization includes receiving a claim transaction message associated with a pharmacy claim transaction for a prescription that satisfies a prior authorization (PA) trigger condition, the message including a plan identifier and a prescriber identifier. The method includes querying a database with the prescriber identifier and plan identifier to access prescriber reference data, healthcare plan provisions, and jurisdictional regulations, as well as applying pre-approval rules to the prescriber reference data, healthcare plan provisions, and jurisdictional regulations, the pre-approval rules defining pre-approval conditions for pharmacy PAs. The method includes, when the pre-approval conditions are met, automatically appending an approval data element to the message to generate a PA approval message and transmitting the PA approval message. The method further includes writing a record to the database including whether the transaction satisfied the pre-approval conditions.