Phase Change Ink Homogenization via Multi-Stage In-Line Rotor-Stator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing phase change or solid inks, such as those used in ink jet systems, lack flexibility and do not provide adequate homogenization capabilities, leading to suboptimal particle size distribution and ink quality.

Innovation Solution

A process utilizing a multiple-stage in-line homogenizer with rotor-stator style blades, installed externally to the mixing vessel, which allows for high-shear dispersion of coloring materials in a medium at temperatures above 100°C, followed by filtration to achieve submicron particle sizes and improved ink quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a single-stage batch mixer is used, then the device complexity is low, but the manufacturing precision of particle size distribution is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size distributionVSAvoidmixer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing process is divided into multiple stages using a multi-stage homogenizer system. Each stage performs a specific function in the dispersion process, with subsequent stages building upon the previous one to achieve progressively finer particle sizes and more uniform distributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary dispersion actions in earlier stages before reaching the final stage. Each stage prepares the mixture for the next, progressively breaking down aggregates and distributing particles more uniformly before the final homogenization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If in-tank homogenizers are used, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to different vessel geometries is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel geometry compatibilityVSAvoidhomogenizer installation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The homogenizer is extracted from the tank interior and installed externally on the vessel. This external mounting allows the homogenizer to be adapted to various vessel geometries and configurations without being constrained by internal tank structure, while the homogenization function remains separate from the containment structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If high shear mixing is applied, then the manufacturing precision of particle size is improved, but the use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidmixing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The high-shear mixing process is segmented into multiple stages rather than applying maximum shear continuously. Each stage applies appropriate shear force for that stage's specific dispersion needs, with energy input optimized for each phase of the homogenization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mixing process uses periodic or cyclic action patterns where the homogenizer operates in alternating phases of high-shear mixing and lower-shear recovery. This allows the system to achieve fine particle sizes through intermittent high-shear events rather than continuous maximum-power operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of inks with narrower particle size distributions and enhanced stability, ensuring better image quality and long-term storage, as evidenced by successful filtration tests and improved performance in ink jet applications.

Implementation Method 1

mixing the dispersion in an in-line homogenizer at high shear until the particle size of the coloring material is less than 0.2 μm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh shear: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

filtering the dispersion at a molten state with one or more filters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

obtaining an extrusion of coloring material from an extruder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExtrusion: Extrusion

Data Source

PatentUS7556679B2Processes for preparing phase change inks
Publication Date: 2009.07.07 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US7556679B2 patent drawing
  • US7556679B2 patent drawing
  • US7556679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The presently disclosed embodiments are directed to processes for making phase change or solid ink used in ink jet system recording apparatuses (e.g., printer, copying machine, facsimile, word processor, plotter, and the like). More particularly, the embodiments pertain to the preparation of pigment or dye-based solid ink using a rotor-stator style, in-line homogenizer.