Phase Offset Estimation for Satellite De-spreading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing phase offset estimation methods in satellite communication systems yield poor results at low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions due to degraded estimation accuracy when phase offsets are estimated in stages using only a small portion of the received signal's energy.

Innovation Solution

A method that estimates a common phase offset between successive block repetitions using multiple repetitions, allowing for coherent combining of received signals by calculating phase differences and utilizing Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) or Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) to determine phase offset hypotheses, which improves estimation accuracy and reduces de-spreading loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If phase offset estimation is performed in stages using only a small portion of the received signal's energy, then the computational complexity is reduced, but the estimation accuracy is significantly degraded at low SNR

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidphase offset estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines all received signal energy from multiple block repetitions simultaneously for phase offset estimation, rather than processing repetitions in stages. This is achieved by constructing a matrix from all received repetitions and computing the phase offset using the full signal energy, which maintains estimation accuracy at low SNR while accepting increased computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If more signal energy is used for phase offset estimation, then the estimation accuracy is improved, but the processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase offset estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces iterative sequential processing with a direct matrix-based computation approach. By formulating the phase offset estimation as a closed-form solution using matrix operations on all received repetitions simultaneously, the method achieves high estimation accuracy without the time loss associated with multiple iterative stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If iterative phase offset estimation and combining is performed sequentially, then the device complexity is reduced, but the de-spreading loss increases at low SNR

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing structure complexityVSAvoidde-spreading loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary phase offset estimation using all received signal energy before combining the repetitions. By estimating the phase offset once using the complete signal energy from all repetitions and then applying this single estimation to correct all repetitions simultaneously, the method avoids the de-spreading loss that occurs when iterative sequential processing is used at low SNR.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9094266B2Efficient de-spreading
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS
  • US9094266B2 patent drawing
  • US9094266B2 patent drawing
  • US9094266B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Satellite communication systems utilize spreading by repetition techniques, including block repetition, to enable operation at low signal to noise conditions. A carrier frequency offset between a transmitter and a receiver results in phase offsets between repetitions. Thus, combining the repetitions requires estimation of the phase offset between the repetitions before coherent de-spreading can be performed. Disclosed herein are methods for estimating a phase offset between successive block repetitions. The methods may utilize more than two repetitions for determining a common phase offset between any two successive repetitions. In some embodiments, these methods may allow summation of repetitions with better coherency and/or with a lower de-spreading loss.