Phase-Selective Oscillator Entrainment Without State Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Controlling and manipulating the phase patterns of heterogeneous nonlinear oscillator ensembles without state feedback information is challenging, especially in biological systems where precise control of neural or electrochemical processes is needed, due to uncertainties in model parameters and initial conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method using 2π-periodic control signals to detune natural frequencies and shift phases of oscillators, employing an interaction function and phase response curve to achieve specific phase patterns in oscillator ensembles, allowing for robust entrainment without requiring feedback or precise initial condition knowledge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If feedback control techniques are used to control oscillator ensembles, then control precision can be improved, but system complexity and requirement for state information increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the feedback control component from the system, transitioning from closed-loop to open-loop control. By eliminating the need for state feedback information and complex control algorithms, the system achieves simpler implementation while maintaining effective phase pattern control through carefully designed periodic forcing signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The oscillator ensemble inherently responds to periodic forcing signals through its natural dynamics and phase response properties. The system exploits the intrinsic characteristics of the oscillators, including their phase response curves and natural frequencies, to achieve self-organization into desired phase patterns without requiring external feedback or complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If state feedback information is required for control, then control accuracy improves, but practical implementation becomes difficult in biological systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidimplementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the requirement for state feedback information from the control system. By designing open-loop periodic forcing signals based on predetermined phase response curves and natural frequencies, the system achieves effective control without needing to measure or access the real-time state of individual oscillators, making it practically implementable in biological systems where such information is unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The control strategy relies on pre-characterizing the phase response curves and natural frequencies of the oscillators before control is applied. By preparing the periodic forcing signals in advance based on these predetermined properties, the system achieves accurate phase pattern control without requiring real-time state information or feedback during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If homogeneous activation of oscillators is applied, then control simplicity is maintained, but fine manipulation of individual subsystems is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidfine manipulation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different phase offsets to different groups or subsets of oscillators within the ensemble through the design of periodic forcing signals. By modulating the amplitude and phase of the forcing signal at different times, the system can selectively entrain specific subsets of oscillators to different phase patterns, achieving fine-grained control over individual subsystems while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If precise model specification and initial conditions are required, then control precision improves, but robustness to parameter uncertainty decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidrobustness to uncertainty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs periodic forcing signals that are robust to variations in oscillator parameters by exploiting the inherent properties of phase response curves and natural frequencies. The control approach uses frequency detuning and phase offset adjustments that maintain effectiveness across a range of parameter values, achieving both precision and robustness without requiring exact model specification or precise initial conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10693416B2Phase-selective entrainment of nonlinear oscillator ensembles
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 WASHINGTON UNIV IN SAINT LOUIS
  • US10693416B2 patent drawing
  • US10693416B2 patent drawing
  • US10693416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for entraining an oscillator ensemble is disclosed that includes a plurality of oscillators in an entrained phase pattern. The system includes an entrainment device operatively coupled to each non-linear oscillator of the oscillator ensemble, and the entrainment control device is configured to deliver a 2π-periodic control signal v(θ) to all oscillators of the plurality of oscillators to induce the entrained phase pattern.