Phase Shifting Algorithm Sensitivity for Interferometry Errors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sinusoidal phase-shifting interferometry in Fizeau interferometers is prone to signal distortions due to multiple reflections within the cavity, leading to errors in determining phase differences between reference and test light, which existing algorithms struggle to accurately mitigate.

Innovation Solution

Designing phase-shifting algorithms with specific sensitivity filters that reduce sensitivity to contributions from multiple reflections, particularly by enforcing peak sensitivity to the fundamental sinusoidal phase modulation amplitude while minimizing sensitivity to integer multiples, such as twice the amplitude, to suppress errors caused by multiple round-trip reflections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If sinusoidal phase-shifting interferometry is used in Fizeau interferometers, then the ease of operation and implementation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to signal distortions from multiple reflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidphase difference determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of multiple reflections into a beneficial filtering mechanism. By designing the phase-shifting algorithm to specifically suppress integer multiples of the fundamental frequency (including the second harmonic from double-pass reflections), the algorithm transforms what was previously a source of error into a means of identifying and eliminating spurious signals, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the algorithm's sensitivity parameters by enforcing peak sensitivity at the fundamental sinusoidal phase modulation amplitude while minimizing sensitivity to integer multiples. This parameter optimization allows the system to distinguish between valid interference signals and spurious reflections, resolving the precision issue without complicating the operational procedure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If algorithms with high sensitivity to fundamental phase modulation are used, then measurement precision is improved, but sensitivity to integer multiples (spurious reflections) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase difference determination accuracyVSAvoidsensitivity to multiple reflections
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating non-uniform sensitivity distribution across different frequency components. The algorithm is designed with peak sensitivity specifically at the fundamental frequency while having minimal sensitivity at integer multiples. This localized sensitivity optimization allows the system to enhance detection of valid signals while simultaneously suppressing spurious reflections, resolving the contradiction between precision and harmful factor sensitivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If standard phase-shifting algorithms are used, then device complexity is kept low, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to mitigate multiple reflection errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm complexityVSAvoidaccuracy of phase difference determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms within the phase-shifting algorithm that automatically identify and suppress signals at integer multiples of the fundamental frequency. The algorithm uses the known relationship between the modulation amplitude and harmonic frequencies to dynamically adjust sensitivity, providing self-correcting behavior that improves reliability without requiring complex external intervention or additional hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed algorithm significantly reduces errors related to multiple reflections, enhancing the accuracy of phase difference determination and improving the reliability of sinusoidal phase-shifting interferometry in Fizeau interferometers.

Implementation Method 1

one can use an interferometer to combine a test wavefront reflected from a test surface with a reference wavefront reflected from a reference surface to form an optical interference pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

sinusoidally varying a phase between the test light and reference light, where the sinusoidal phase variation has an amplitude u

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase modulation: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentUS7948637B2Error compensation in phase shifting interferometry
Publication Date: 2011.05.24 ZYGO CORP
  • US7948637B2 patent drawing
  • US7948637B2 patent drawing
  • US7948637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In certain aspects, disclosed methods include combining reference light reflected from a reference surface with test light reflected from a test surface to form combined light, the test and reference light being derived from a common source, sinusoidally varying a phase between the test light and reference light, where the sinusoidal phase variation has an amplitude u, recording at least one interference signal related to changes in an intensity of the combined light in response to the sinusoidal variation of the phase, determining information related to the phase using a phase shifting algorithm that has a sensitivity that varies as a function of the sinusoidal phase shift amplitude, where the sensitivity of the algorithm at 2 u is 10% or less of the sensitivity of the algorithm at u.