Synchronizing Component Phase to Reduce Image Banding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Perceptible image quality defects in image printing systems, such as banding, arise from variations within components and subsystems, which are difficult to eliminate with tight tolerances that increase manufacturing costs without ensuring uniform prints.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that identify and synchronize the phase of image quality defects within components and subsystems, using a controller to adjust their operation so that defects overlap at least once per cycle, thereby minimizing their visibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If tight tolerances are applied to all components and subsystems, then image quality defects are reduced, but unit manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality uniformityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters of components (rotation speed, phase alignment) rather than relying solely on tight manufacturing tolerances. By adjusting the phase relationship between periodic variations in different subsystems, the system achieves improved image quality uniformity without requiring all components to be manufactured with tight tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts harmful periodic variations into beneficial effects by synchronizing them in phase. Instead of trying to eliminate all variations through tight tolerances, the system allows variations to exist but aligns them so that their combined effect minimizes perceptible image quality defects, particularly banding artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Manufacturing precision

If tight tolerances are applied to all components and subsystems, then image quality defects are reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality uniformityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces control parameters (phase adjustment, synchronization timing) that allow the system to achieve uniform image quality through operational adjustments rather than complex manufacturing tolerances. The controller modifies operational parameters to synchronize component variations, reducing the need for complex manufacturing specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If components operate with independent variations, then manufacturing is simpler, but perceptible image quality defects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidperceptible image quality defects
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the harmful effect of independent component variations into a beneficial outcome by synchronizing these variations in phase. The controller detects periodic variations in each subsystem and adjusts their timing so that their combined effect minimizes perceptible defects like banding, thereby maintaining manufacturing simplicity while improving image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system that monitors image quality defects and adjusts component operation accordingly. The controller detects periodic variations, determines their phase relationships, and modifies operational parameters to synchronize variations, thereby reducing perceptible defects while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8320013B2Synchronization of variation within components to reduce perceptible image quality defects
Publication Date: 2012.11.27 XEROX CORP
  • US8320013B2 patent drawing
  • US8320013B2 patent drawing
  • US8320013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for synchronizing variations in components or subsystems in an image printing system is provided. The method includes identifying a plurality of image quality defects printed by the image printing system by a controller, said image quality defects each occurring with an associated frequency and each being associated with a component or subsystem of the image printing system; determining a phase difference of the image quality defects by the controller; and adjusting operation of each component or subsystem associated with the image quality defects, such that image quality defects are in phase.