Phased Array Beam Control for Distributed Multi-Target Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current phased array systems lack efficient control mechanisms for managing multiple beams and targets across large scan volumes, especially in distributed and geographically remote operations, which complicates target tracking and monitoring in multiple frequency bands.

Innovation Solution

A distributed control system with touchscreen-based gesture control allows operators to command and monitor multiple beams via networked control stations, enabling selection of operating modes, beam formation, and automatic adjustment of azimuth and elevation for target tracking, using visual, audible, and haptic feedback, and supporting open loop and closed loop modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If phased array systems operate simultaneously in multiple frequency bands with numerous antenna elements, then the system can perform multiple functions and track multiple targets, but the device complexity and difficulty of control increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-function capabilityVSAvoidsystem control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control interface is segmented into multiple functional windows (status window, beam window, scan window) that separately manage different aspects of system control. Each window handles specific tasks independently, allowing operators to control multiple beams and frequency bands without being overwhelmed by the overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A distributed control system with networked control stations serves as an intermediary between the operator and the complex phased array system. The control system translates operator actions into precise beam control commands, managing the complexity of multi-frequency band operations and antenna element coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the control interface provides comprehensive information and control options for managing multiple beams and targets, then the system capability increases, but the ease of operation decreases due to information overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget tracking efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol interface usability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control interface divides comprehensive system information into separate functional windows. The status window displays system state, the beam window manages beam selection and configuration, and the scan window presents target information. This segmentation allows operators to access comprehensive control capabilities while presenting information in manageable, context-specific portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control interface uses a spatial window-based layout to organize control functions and information. Instead of presenting all controls in a single linear interface, the system distributes controls across multiple windows that can be positioned and arranged in two-dimensional space, allowing operators to navigate complex controls more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If distributed control stations are located in separate geographic locations, then operational flexibility and security improve, but system coordination and communication complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidnetwork coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements a universal control interface that functions identically across all distributed control stations regardless of location. Each control station can independently perform all beam control and target tracking functions, providing operational flexibility while the standardized interface simplifies network coordination by ensuring consistent behavior across all nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system provides real-time feedback between distributed control stations and the phased array system, enabling coordinated operation across geographic locations. The system monitors and communicates system state, beam status, and target information to all control stations, allowing remote operators to maintain situational awareness and coordinate their actions effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3394716B1Systems and methods for phased array beam control
Publication Date: 2023.09.06 RAYTHEON CO
  • EP3394716B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3394716B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3394716B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Described embodiments provide techniques for controlling a phased array system by a control system including one or more distributed control stations. At least one of the control stations displays a control interface having a status window, a beam window, and a scan window. The control system instructs the phased array system to operate in an operating mode selected from among selectable operating modes displayed in the status window. In the beam window, at least one beam is selected from among selectable beams available to track a target. The control system instructs the phased array system to form the selected beam and assigns the formed beam to (i) track a target detected by the phased array system, or (ii) monitor a selected location. The scan window displays (i) targets tracked by the phased array system, and (ii) beams generated by the phased array system.