Broadband Phased Array Monoliths for Low-Profile Dual Polarization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing broadband phased array antennas face challenges in achieving a lightweight, low-cost, and mechanically robust design with dual-polarization capabilities, as they often have a thick physical profile and difficulties in mechanical robustness, particularly in achieving suitable impedance transformation and connectorization.

Innovation Solution

The development of a broadband phased array using additively manufactured metallic monoliths with intra-element structures, which include tapered slot edge impedance matching elements and capacitive coupling, allowing for balanced feed mechanisms and improved manufacturability, while maintaining a low profile and enhancing RF performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional Vivaldi tapered slot antennas are used, then broadband radiation capability is achieved, but the physical profile becomes thick and mechanical robustness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroadband radiation capabilityVSAvoidphysical profile thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna element is divided into multiple thin metallic layers separated by dielectric spacers, creating a segmented structure that maintains broadband radiation capability while reducing overall thickness. Each layer contributes to the radiation function, allowing the element to achieve the necessary electrical length without increasing physical profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple metallic layers are nested within each other with dielectric spacers in between, creating a compact multi-layer configuration. This nesting approach allows the antenna to achieve the required electrical dimensions for broadband operation while maintaining a thin physical profile suitable for low-cost fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If egg-crate structures are used to achieve dual polarization, then polarization capability is improved, but mechanical robustness and ease of manufacture deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedual polarization capabilityVSAvoidmechanical robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-polarization capability is achieved by segmenting the antenna element into multiple functional layers, where different layers support different polarization modes. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex egg-crate structures while maintaining dual-polarization performance and improving manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-layer metallic structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides dual-polarization capability, maintains mechanical robustness through layer stacking, and enables low-cost fabrication using standard PCB techniques. Each layer contributes to both structural integrity and radiation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If impedance transformation structures are added to improve broadband performance, then RF performance is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroadband RF performanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impedance transformation function is merged into the multi-layer metallic structure itself, rather than being implemented as separate components. The progressive spacing and configuration of metallic layers provide gradual impedance transformation across the broadband range, simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining excellent RF performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Impedance transformation is achieved by changing the geometric parameters of the metallic layers, such as their spacing, area, and configuration. By adjusting these parameters across different layers, the structure provides continuous impedance matching across the broadband frequency range without adding structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If additive manufacturing is used for metallic monoliths, then manufacturing precision and reliability are improved, but production cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural precisionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of additive manufacturing each antenna element individually, the design uses standard PCB fabrication techniques to create precise metallic patterns on substrates. This copying approach using established manufacturing processes achieves the required structural precision at lower cost and higher volume production rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing approach is changed from additive manufacturing to subtractive PCB fabrication methods. By changing the manufacturing parameters and processes, the design achieves comparable or superior precision while significantly reducing production cost and increasing ease of manufacture through industry-standard techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution results in a lightweight, reliable, and cost-effective broadband phased array with improved manufacturability and RF performance, capable of dual-polarization and efficient electromagnetic radiation transmission and reception across a wide frequency range.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of capacitive coupling structures 165 are coupled to the impedance matching elements 150, and configured for capacitive coupling between adjacent pairs of the elements 150

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive coupling: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

radiating sites 135 are defined in the gap regions 130 between the adjacent monoliths 110 by opposing tapered, impedance matching (tapered slot edge) elements 150

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20240429619A1Broadband phased array with intra-element monoliths
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US20240429619A1 patent drawing
  • US20240429619A1 patent drawing
  • US20240429619A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An intra-element monolith has a plurality of impedance matching elements extending from a base. Shorting posts can be provided to couple the base to an inner portion of the respective impedance matching elements, each having a tapered section extending from a leg section spaced laterally from the base. Capacitive coupling structures can also be provided. The impedance matching elements are configured to define radiator, receiver or transmitter sites between similar, opposing impedance matching elements on adjacent instances of the monolithic element. The leg sections extending from a first adjacent pair of the impedance matching elements can be configured for coupling to a signal connector, and operable to be actively driven. The leg sections extending from a second adjacent pair of the impedance matching elements can be configured for coupling to ground, and operable to be excited by the opposing impedance matching elements.