Phenolic Admixture for Electrodepositable Coating Throwpower

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cyclic guanidine-containing electrodepositable coatings face inefficiencies in electrodeposition, leading to poor deposition on substrates and non-uniform film thickness, especially on interior surfaces, due to high basicity and inadequate throwpower, which is not effectively improved by conventional methods like altering voltage or current density.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a source of unreacted phenol in a cyclic guanidine-containing electrodepositable coating composition, specifically a reaction product of an epoxy functional polymer and cyclic guanidine, with the phenol present in at least 0.5 molar equivalent to 1 molar equivalent, to enhance electrodeposition efficiency and achieve better throwpower.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cyclic guanidine is used in the amination of epoxy resins, then curing effectiveness is improved, but deposition on substrate deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecuring effectivenessVSAvoiddeposition quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary substance (metal catalyst such as zinc, calcium, or barium compound) that mediates between the cyclic guanidine and the substrate. The catalyst facilitates the deposition process without compromising the curing effectiveness, thereby resolving the contradiction between improved curing and poor deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the coating composition by adding metal catalysts at specific concentrations (0.01-5% by weight). This parameter change enables the system to achieve both effective curing and proper substrate deposition simultaneously, resolving the contradiction through controlled chemical modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If voltage or current density is increased to improve throwpower, then coating uniformity is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating uniformityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by introducing metal catalysts and controlling their concentration, which fundamentally alters the deposition mechanism. This allows achieving good coating uniformity at lower voltage and current density levels, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining coating quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the reliance on mechanical/electrical parameters (high voltage and current density) with a chemically-driven deposition mechanism using metal catalysts. This substitution allows the deposition process to proceed efficiently at lower energy inputs while maintaining coating uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If conventional methods are used to alter throwpower, then deposition speed is improved, but coating efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition speedVSAvoidcoating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces metal catalysts with specific concentration ranges (0.01-5% by weight) to optimize the chemical reaction kinetics. This parameter optimization enables faster deposition rates while maintaining high coating efficiency, resolving the contradiction between speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite coating system combining cyclic guanidine, epoxy resin, and metal catalyst compounds. This composite formulation synergistically enhances both deposition speed and coating efficiency, achieving improvements in both parameters simultaneously rather than the trade-off seen with conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The addition of unreacted phenol improves the electrodeposition process, allowing for thicker film coverage on substrates with reduced voltage and current density, resulting in more uniform coatings and lower coulombic usage, thereby addressing the inefficiencies in cyclic guanidine-based coatings.

Implementation Method 1

an electrodepositable coating composition comprising a reaction product of an epoxy functional polymer and a cyclic guanidine, and a source of unreacted phenol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodeposition: Electrodeposition

Data Source

PatentEP2970689B1Phenolic admix for electrodepositable coating composition containing a cyclic guanidine
Publication Date: 2017.09.20 PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC
  • EP2970689B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2970689B1 patent drawing
  • EP2970689B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to an electrodepositable coating composition comprising a reaction product of an epoxy functional polymer and a cyclic guanidine, and a source of unreacted phenol, wherein the electrodepositable coating composition has a columbic usage of less than 100 coulombs/gram when deposited on a conductive substrate at a current density of ≤ 1.5 mAmps/cm². Methods of making the electrodepositable coating composition are also disclosed.