Phenotype Prediction Model for Genetic Design Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in synthetic biology is to efficiently optimize the phenotype of a biological system by finding the optimal genetic design among a vast number of possible genetic sequences, which is hindered by the exponential scaling of combinatorial possibilities and the high computational complexity of search problems.

Innovation Solution

A specialized prediction model is developed to optimize the phenotype of a biological system by encoding genotype information into experiential genotype vectors, training a phenotype prediction model, and using Sequential Model Based Optimization (SMBO) to iteratively select and evaluate genetic designs, thereby reducing computational complexity and identifying optimal genetic constructs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If exhaustive search of all possible genetic sequences is performed to optimize phenotype, then optimal genetic design can be found, but the number of experiments required becomes prohibitively large due to exponential scaling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidnumber of experiments
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vast genetic search space into smaller, manageable subspaces by identifying and focusing on specific gene regions and variants that are most likely to influence the desired phenotype. This segmentation allows exhaustive or near-exhaustive search within subspaces rather than the entire space, dramatically reducing experiment numbers while maintaining optimization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by using bioinformatics tools and databases to pre-filter and prioritize genetic variants before experimental testing. This preliminary computational screening identifies the most promising candidates for experimental validation, reducing the number of wet-lab experiments required while ensuring the optimal design is found.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If the search space is narrowed to known gene variants involved in compound production, then the number of experiments is reduced, but the computational complexity and difficulty in quantifying phenotype expressions for unassessed genotypes remain high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of experimentsVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediary computational models and prediction algorithms that bridge the gap between genotype sequences and phenotype expressions. These intermediary tools estimate phenotype outcomes for unassessed genotypes based on known relationships, reducing the need for extensive experimental testing while managing computational complexity through efficient algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by transforming the representation of genetic data and using dimensionality reduction techniques. By converting genetic sequences into numerical representations and applying mathematical transformations, the patent reduces computational complexity while preserving the essential information needed to predict and optimize phenotype expressions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12293306B2Method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for efficiently optimizing a phenotype with a specialized prediction model
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 TESELAGEN BIOTECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12293306B2 patent drawing
  • US12293306B2 patent drawing
  • US12293306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for efficiently optimizing a phenotype with a specialized prediction model, including receiving constraints, encoding genotype information in experimental data points corresponding to the constraints experiential genotype vectors, the experimental data points comprising the genotype information and phenotype information corresponding to the genotype information, training a phenotype prediction model based on the experiential genotype vectors, the corresponding phenotype information, and the one or more constraints, applying the phenotype prediction model to available genotypes corresponding to the constrains to generate scores, determining result genotypes based on a ranking of the available genotypes according to the scores, and generating, a result based on the result genotypes, the result indicating one or more genetic constructs for testing.