Phenotypic Response Surface for Personalized Immunosuppression Dosing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current immunosuppression dosing strategies in transplant patients rely on population-based data, failing to account for individual variability in drug metabolism and immune response, leading to risks of infection, toxicity, and graft rejection.

Innovation Solution

The use of an artificial intelligence-based complex systems approach called phenotypic personalized medicine (PPM) to optimize immunosuppression dosing by generating a Phenotypic Response Surface (PRS) based on individual patient data, including donor-derived cell-free DNA fraction as a biomarker for allograft injury.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If population-based dosing protocols are used, then standardization and ease of implementation are improved, but individual patient variability in drug metabolism and immune response is not accounted for, leading to over- or underimmunosuppression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosing implementationVSAvoidindividual dosing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the dosing parameter from fixed population-based protocols to dynamic, personalized dosing based on measured phenotypic parameters. The system measures multiple phenotypic parameters (drug concentrations, immune markers, metabolic rates) and adjusts dosing parameters accordingly to achieve optimal immunosuppression for each individual patient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where patient responses to immunosuppression are continuously monitored through phenotypic measurements. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust dosing regimens based on actual patient responses, correcting for individual variability in drug metabolism and immune response over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If increased immunosuppression is administered, then graft rejection is prevented, but risk of infection and toxicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraft acceptanceVSAvoidinfection and toxicity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring the immunosuppression intensity to the specific needs of each patient and even to different time points. Rather than uniform high-dose immunosuppression, the system adjusts dosing locally based on individual phenotypic characteristics and real-time patient response, providing just enough suppression to prevent rejection while minimizing toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static dosing protocols to dynamic dosing that adapts to changing patient conditions. The system continuously monitors phenotypic parameters and adjusts immunosuppression levels dynamically, increasing when rejection risk is high and decreasing when infection risk emerges, thereby balancing graft protection with patient safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If drug combinations acting on multiple targets are used, then immunosuppression efficacy is improved, but complexity of dosing optimization and ADME variability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmunosuppression efficacyVSAvoiddosing optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages combination drug dosing by measuring phenotypic parameters that reflect the integrated effect of multiple drugs on their various targets. Rather than attempting to optimize each drug independently, the system measures downstream phenotypic outcomes and adjusts the combination dosing parameters to achieve the desired overall immunosuppressive effect, simplifying the optimization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses phenotypic measurements as intermediary indicators of drug efficacy and toxicity. These phenotypic markers serve as mediators that translate the complex interactions of multiple drugs on multiple targets into measurable outcomes, allowing the system to optimize combination dosing based on actual biological response rather than theoretical drug interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250186406A1Optimizing immunosuppression in transplant patients using personalized phenotypic dosing model
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US20250186406A1 patent drawing
  • US20250186406A1 patent drawing
  • US20250186406A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The art does not provide systematic and reproducible methods to personalize dosing of multiple immunosuppressive medications after transplantation. This invention provides a method to systematize multi-drug immuno suppression management in tissue and organ transplantation using an artificial intelligence-based complex systems approach. In embodiments of this invention, immunosuppression drug dose, blood drug concentrations, donor-derived fraction of cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA %), and aspartate aminotransferase are used to indicate allograft status or a proxy for allograft status, to generate a phenotypic response surface to produce individual treatment modalities and dosages using empirically determined unique coefficients. This surface is used to calculate appropriate immunosuppression drug doses associated with the desired outcome for that patient. Embodiments of this disclosure are directed to identifying optimized combinations of inputs for the complex system of the immunosuppressed transplant patient in order to avoid transplant rejection while avoiding unnecessary toxicity and maintaining a robust enough immune response to fight infection.