Substituted Phenylurea Synthesis via Segmented Melt-Phase Reactor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing substituted phenylurea derivatives, such as 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, face challenges including complex separation and purification of solvents, formation of undesirable by-products like biphenylureas, and dimerization or trimerization of isocyanates due to inadequate temperature control and mixing.

Innovation Solution

The reaction is carried out in a reactor with a surface area to volume ratio of 100 to 5000 m^2/m^3, using a tubular reactor with static mixers and a molar excess of amine to minimize by-product formation, while maintaining controlled temperature and pressure conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the reaction is carried out in a stirred reactor with controlled addition of reactants, then temperature control is achieved, but long residence times lead to formation of undesirable by-products such as dimerization and trimerization of isocyanate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoiddimerization and trimerization of isocyanate
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The stirred reactor is segmented into multiple zones with different functions: a first zone for initial mixing and reaction, and a second zone for continued reaction without intense mixing. This segmentation allows temperature control in the first zone while minimizing by-product formation in the second zone by reducing residence time at high temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mixing intensity is dynamically adjusted across different zones of the reactor. The first zone employs intensive mixing for rapid heat dissipation, while the second zone uses minimal or no mixing to reduce residence time and prevent isocyanate decomposition. This dynamic approach optimizes both temperature control and product purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If solvent processes are used with water-immiscible solvents, then reaction proceeds smoothly, but laborious solvent removal and recycling is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction smoothnessVSAvoidsolvent removal and recycling system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the solvent from the reaction system entirely, performing the reaction in the melt phase without any solvent. This removes the need for complex solvent removal and recycling equipment, while still maintaining smooth reaction progression through controlled melt-phase reactant addition and the segmented reactor design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If aqueous amine solutions are used, then the reaction can proceed, but hydrolysis of isocyanate occurs leading to formation of biphenylureas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction feasibilityVSAvoidbiphenylurea formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the physical state parameter of the amine from aqueous solution to anhydrous liquid or melt phase. This parameter change eliminates water from the system, preventing isocyanate hydrolysis and biphenylurea formation, while maintaining reaction feasibility through direct liquid-phase or melt-phase reaction of the pure amine with isocyanate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If high molar excess of amine is used to minimize by-products, then conversion improves, but significant amounts of biphenylureas still form and require further purification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rateVSAvoidproduct purity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary action by pre-mixing the isocyanate with a small amount of amine (0.1-5 wt%) before introducing the bulk amine. This preliminary mixing ensures uniform distribution and immediate reaction of isocyanate, preventing its decomposition into biphenylureas even when high molar excess of amine is used. The result is both high conversion and high purity without requiring additional purification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves high conversion (>99.998%) and purity (>99.7%) of the target phenylurea derivative with minimal formation of undesirable by-products, such as biphenylureas and dimerization products, thereby simplifying the purification process and reducing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

adequate heat removal and thus temperature control must be ensured through appropriate technical measures due to the highly exothermic nature of the reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

In the case of local amine deficiency caused by insufficient mixing, the isocyanate is not converted sufficiently rapidly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing: Stirring

Data Source

PatentEP4556462A1Process for the preparation of substituted phenylurea derivatives
Publication Date: 2025.05.21 LANXESS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
  • EP4556462A1 patent drawing
  • EP4556462A1 patent drawing
  • EP4556462A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a novel process for the preparation of substituted phenylurea derivatives, in particular 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.