Mobile Phone Distraction Scoring via Contextual Interaction Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for determining and reporting mobile phone distraction of drivers are limited in accurately assessing the risk of distraction, as they rely solely on screen state and phone-lock state, without considering additional factors like phone tapping or user interaction, which can lead to inaccurate scoring and failure to capture the full extent of distraction episodes.

Innovation Solution

The system enhances distraction assessment by incorporating 'distraction context' factors, such as phone tapping and user feedback, to identify interaction with the phone and determine the relevance of distraction episodes, and scores each episode based on these contexts to provide a more accurate risk assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system relies solely on screen state and phone-lock state to assess distraction, then the system complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision of distraction risk is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistraction risk assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments distraction assessment into multiple independent detection dimensions: screen state detection, phone-lock state detection, phone tapping detection, and user interaction detection. Each dimension is processed separately through dedicated detection modules, allowing comprehensive assessment without requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional two-dimensional assessment (screen state and lock state) to multi-dimensional assessment by adding phone tapping detection and user interaction detection dimensions. This dimensional expansion enables more precise distraction risk measurement while maintaining modular system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the system incorporates multiple distraction context factors like phone tapping and user interaction, then the measurement precision of distraction risk is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistraction episode relevance accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements separate detection modules for each distraction context factor: screen state module, phone-lock state module, phone tapping module, and user interaction module. This segmentation allows each factor to be processed independently with optimized algorithms, improving measurement precision without creating an unmanageably complex monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a unified distraction assessment framework that handles multiple types of distraction indicators (screen state, lock state, tapping, user interaction) through a common processing architecture. This multi-functional approach enables the system to accommodate various distraction factors without requiring separate complete processing chains for each, thereby controlling overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the system uses comprehensive distraction context factors to score each episode, then the reliability of risk assessment is improved, but the loss of time for processing and scoring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and classification of distraction indicators as they occur, pre-processing the data into standardized formats. This preliminary action enables faster subsequent scoring and assessment operations, as the raw data has already been organized and validated, reducing the time penalty associated with comprehensive multi-factor analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service mechanisms where distraction episodes automatically trigger scoring based on pre-configured criteria and weightings. Once an episode is detected and contextual factors are identified, the scoring process autonomously evaluates the episode using established algorithms without requiring manual intervention or complex real-time decision-making, thereby maintaining reliability while minimizing processing time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10672249B1Determining, scoring, and reporting mobile phone distraction of a driver
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 CAMBRIDGE MOBILE TELEMATICS INC
  • US10672249B1 patent drawing
  • US10672249B1 patent drawing
  • US10672249B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Among other things, information generated by sensors of a mobile phone and indicative of motion of the mobile phone and state information indicative of a state of operation of the mobile phone are monitored. Based on the monitoring, distraction by a user of the mobile phone who is a driver of a vehicle is determined.