Photo Clustering via Multi-Parameter Event Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital photography sharing systems fail to effectively recognize and cluster photos taken by multiple users at the same event, limiting the ability to aggregate and share memories across social networks.

Innovation Solution

A system that compares timestamp, geo-location, and content data from digital photographs to identify coincident events across users, generating a confidence score to determine if photos are from the same event, and allows users to publish and combine photos on an event page after user permission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If photo sharing systems store and distribute digital photos across users, then photo distribution capability is improved, but automatic recognition and clustering of coincident event photos is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephoto distribution capabilityVSAvoidautomatic event recognition
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically comparing metadata (timestamps, geo-location data, device identifiers) of photos before user intervention is needed. This preliminary automated comparison identifies potential coincident event photos and presents them to users for confirmation, thereby maintaining automation while enabling versatile photo distribution across users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated recognition layer between photo distribution and user viewing. This intermediary process analyzes photo metadata, identifies coincident events, and clusters photos automatically, bridging the gap between versatile photo sharing and automated event recognition without requiring direct user involvement in the recognition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system compares multiple data types (timestamp, geo-location, content) to identify coincident events, then event recognition accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent recognition accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the photo comparison process into distinct analytical components: timestamp comparison, geo-location comparison, device identifier comparison, and content analysis. Each segment processes specific metadata types independently and contributes to the overall coincident event determination, thereby improving recognition accuracy through comprehensive multi-dimensional analysis while managing complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by analyzing multiple dimensions of photo data simultaneously (temporal parameters via timestamps, spatial parameters via geo-location, device parameters via identifiers). By transforming the recognition problem into a multi-parameter comparison task, the system achieves high event recognition accuracy while using standardized parameter types that can be processed efficiently through consistent comparison logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If users must provide permission before photos are combined on event pages, then user privacy control is improved, but photo aggregation speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser privacy controlVSAvoidphoto aggregation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated identification and clustering of coincident event photos before user permission is obtained. Photos are pre-processed, compared, and grouped into candidate event collections automatically. When users provide permission, the aggregation is already substantially complete, requiring only final confirmation and publishing, thereby maintaining strong privacy control while minimizing the time users need to wait for photo aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11263492B2Automatic event recognition and cross-user photo clustering
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11263492B2 patent drawing
  • US11263492B2 patent drawing
  • US11263492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for automatic event recognition and photo clustering. In one aspect, methods include receiving, from a first user, first image data corresponding to a first image, receiving, from a second user, second image data corresponding to a second image, comparing the first image data and the second image data, and determining that the first image and the second image correspond to a coincident event based on the comparing.