Photo-acoustic Tomography Defect Testing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing non-destructive testing methods for detecting sub-surface defects in parts using photo-acoustic tomography are complex, expensive, and time-consuming, requiring substantial setup and processing time.

Innovation Solution

A part defect testing method utilizing a system that generates a hammer beam and a read-out beam using laser light of different wavelengths, directing the hammer beam to induce surface movement and using the read-out beam with an areal camera to produce an interferogram, which is then processed to detect defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional photo-acoustic tomography testing systems are used, then defect detection capability is achieved, but system complexity and operational cost increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the complex Michelson interferometer component from the traditional photo-acoustic tomography system. By removing this intricate interferometric setup, the system achieves simplified architecture while maintaining defect detection capability through alternative optical measurement approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical interferometric measurement system with a simplified optical detection system. Instead of using mechanical interferometers to measure surface oscillations, the system employs direct optical detection methods that reduce mechanical complexity while preserving measurement functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If traditional photo-acoustic tomography testing systems are used, then defect detection capability is achieved, but operational cost increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive optical components and simplified detection mechanisms替代 expensive interferometric equipment. By using affordable optical sensors and straightforward measurement systems, the operational cost is substantially reduced while maintaining adequate defect detection precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If traditional photo-acoustic tomography testing systems are used, then defect detection capability is achieved, but scanning time increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidscanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous optical measurement across the part surface without interruption. By maintaining continuous optical detection during the scanning process, the system eliminates idle time between measurements and substantially reduces total scanning time while preserving defect detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic optical pulsing synchronized with acoustic wave detection cycles. This periodic measurement approach allows efficient data collection at optimal moments during acoustic wave propagation, reducing overall scanning time while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for efficient and accurate detection of sub-surface defects in parts by reducing complexity and cost, while also significantly reducing the time required for scanning and defect analysis.

Implementation Method 1

A short pulse laser (i.e. a hammer or ping pulse) is directed incident onto the surface of the PUT to locally heat the surface of the PUT during the pulse width of the laser pulse. This launches an acoustic pulse into the PUT as a result of differential heating, plasma generation or local expansion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhoto-acoustic effect: Photoacoustic Effect

Implementation Method 2

The acoustic response is launched, causing the surfaces of the PUT to minutely move. This motion causes a phase modulation on the read-out beam which can be detected by taking the reflection of the read-out beam and processing it through a Michelson interferometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentEP4161779B1Photo-acoustic tomography defect testing system and method
Publication Date: 2025.01.29 SEURAT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP4161779B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4161779B1 patent drawingFigure 1C
  • EP4161779B1 patent drawingFigure 1D

AI summary

A part defect testing system includes a hammer beam system that provides laser light having a first wavelength. A read-out beam system provides laser light having a second wavelength. A control system is used to direct the generated hammer beam laser light toward a first position on a part to provide an acoustic hammer pulse that induces surface movement of the part. An areal camera is arranged to produce an interferogram derived from reading surface movement of the part using the read-out beam directed to a second position on the part.