Photoconductor Surface Potential Control via Current Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming apparatuses face challenges in accurately estimating and controlling the surface potential of photoconductors, leading to inefficiencies in charging and potential residual charges, which affect image quality and apparatus performance.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus that includes a photoconductor, a charger, and a charge remover configured to remove charge using light and electric discharge, with control circuitry estimating the surface potential based on characteristic values and current flow to adjust the charging bias, ensuring accurate destaticization and improved image formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the charger charges the photoconductor with a fixed charging bias, then the charging process is simple and stable, but the surface potential estimation becomes inaccurate leading to residual charges and reduced image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface potential estimation accuracyVSAvoidcharging control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures the current flowing through the charger during the charging process and uses this feedback information to estimate the surface potential of the photoconductor. The control circuitry adjusts the charging bias based on the estimated surface potential, creating a closed-loop control system that improves measurement precision while managing complexity through intelligent algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the charging bias parameter based on the estimated surface potential. By adjusting the charging voltage in response to measured current values and estimated potential, the system achieves accurate destaticization without requiring overly complex hardware, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the charging bias is adjusted frequently to maintain accurate surface potential, then image quality improves, but the charging process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistencyVSAvoidcharging process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies charging bias in controlled amounts based on the estimated surface potential rather than continuous adjustment. By using the measured current to determine the necessary charging level and applying only the required amount, the system maintains reliable image quality while avoiding excessive charging operations that would reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The charge remover uses light to automatically remove residual charges from the photoconductor surface. This self-service mechanism handles the cleanup of residual charges without requiring manual intervention or complex additional systems, maintaining image quality consistency while preserving charging process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the charge remover removes all charge from the photoconductor, then residual charges are eliminated improving image quality, but energy consumption increases and photoconductor lifespan may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual charge eliminationVSAvoidcharge removal energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The charge remover applies light energy to remove only the necessary residual charges from the photoconductor surface rather than completely depleting all charge. By using the measured current information to determine the appropriate charge removal level, the system eliminates harmful residual charges that affect image quality while avoiding excessive energy consumption and photoconductor degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables precise estimation and control of the photoconductor's surface potential, enhancing image quality and reducing residual charges, thus improving the overall performance and efficiency of the image forming process.

Implementation Method 1

The charge remover is configured to remove charge from a surface of the photoconductor by light and electric discharge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The charge remover is configured to remove charge from a surface of the photoconductor by light and electric discharge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric discharge: Electrostatic Discharge

Implementation Method 3

The charger is configured to charge the photoconductor... control a charging bias applied to the charger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS11226571B2Image forming apparatus that controls a charging bias based on an estimated surface potential
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 RICOH CO LTD
  • US11226571B2 patent drawing
  • US11226571B2 patent drawing
  • US11226571B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus includes a photoconductor, a charger, a charge remover, and control circuitry. The charger is configured to charge the photoconductor. The charge remover is configured to remove charge from a surface of the photoconductor by light and electric discharge. The control circuitry is configured to: estimate a surface potential that the photoconductor has after the photoconductor is charged by the charger, based on a characteristic value of the photoconductor and a value of a current flowing through the charger after the charge remover removes charge from the photoconductor; and control a charging bias applied to the charger, based on the surface potential estimated.